City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Search Results for "hente"

Bach accuses council president of ‘power play’

January 16th, 2013, 6:56 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach said he was “surprised” to learn about a last-minute proposal to change the governance of Colorado Springs Utilities.

The proposed charter change by Chairman Scott Hente and board member Jan Martin calls for replacing the council with a seven-member independent board that would be elected as early as June. Board members would serve four-year terms and be limited to three consecutive terms. The proposal also calls for a supermajority vote of Colorado Springs voters to sell Utilities or any of its assets.

The Gazette asked the mayor to weigh in on the proposal, and here’s what he said in a statement:

“Scott Hente and Jan Martin stated at the Utility Board meeting today that they will bring to City Council next Tuesday a ballot measure for the April Municipal Election, asking voters to approve a change in governance for Colorado Springs Utilities, our largest and most important owned asset.  Mr. Hente and Ms. Martin surprised the other members of the Utility Board and me in making this proposal today at the last minute before the City Council statutory deadline for placing items on the April ballot.  They are suggesting that a new 7-member elected Board control CSU in the future.  While this idea may be worth debate, the community should complete a thorough discussion of all alternatives before this most important decision is made.  This is yet another last minute, piecemeal, proposed change to the City Charter on the eve of Mr. Hente being term limited and leaving City Council.   I’m disappointed that Mr. Hente would attempt this power play as he leaves office, and hope the City Council will turn this back next Tuesday and the other piecemeal Charter changes it is entertaining – which represent bad policy and are not in the best interests of our fellow citizens.”

 

Live mic picks up councilman’s private comment

January 9th, 2013, 2:40 pm by

For months, Elizabeth Reed has showed up at City Hall to address City Council members during the citizen discussion portion of their formal meetings.

Time and time again, Reed expresses concerns about smoking in subsidized housing for seniors.

Reed’s mother lives at Senior Heritage Plaza, a low-income housing apartment complex for the elderly, and is apparently surrounded by neighbors who smoke.

Reed wants a smoke-free building for her mother.

“It’s assault and battery to stick them in a building with profuse second-hand smoke,” Reed told the council recently, referring to people with respiratory problems.

The city has looked into her concerns.

Council Administrator Aimee Cox has spent countless hours, between phone calls and emails, trying to rectify the situation.

Even Mayor Steve Bach’s chief of staff, Laura Neumann, got involved at one point.

Reed has been told that it’s a matter under the purview of the Housing Authority, which has tried to appease Reed, officials say.

But Reed isn’t satisfied and continues to show up at City Hall.

Reed went before council again Tuesday.

“Happy New Year to you all,” Reed said. “I”m here talking about the same thing. I’m sorry that I came back. I know that you didn’t want to see me.”

If only you knew, Ms. Reed.

When council President Scott Hente called Reed up to speak, Councilman Bernie Herpin made a remark under his breath.

A live microphone recorded what he said.

“When are we going to tell her to stop coming here?” Herpin remarked.

To listen for yourself, click here. Reed starts talking at about minute 48.

Herpin did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

 

Council president outraged by Flakes’ candidacy

January 4th, 2013, 10:15 am by

Andy Westbay and Scott Hawrysiak

Some people say Gary Flakes deserves a second chance.

When he was 16 years old, Flakes and his friend gunned down two teen-age boys who were walking home at night on Valentine’s Day 1997.

The victims — Andy Westbay, 13, and Scott Hawrysiak, 15 — were shot with a 12-guage shotgun.

Flakes was tried as an adult and served more than 12 years in prison. His co-conspirator, Jeron Grant, then 17, also served time behind bars.

But neither was convicted of pulling the trigger. Instead, they were convicted in separate trials as accessories to murder.

Though authorities alleged, based on confessions and witness testimony, that Grant was the trigger man, neither Grant nor Flakes has owned up to it.

Now, Flakes, who says he’s a reformed man, is running for City Council District 4.

His candidacy has opened old wounds for the victims’ families and outraged people in the community.

Among them is City Council President Scott Hente.

“I listened (Wednesday) to a former state representative’s beliefs that this guy should be given a second chance,” Hente said, referring to former state Rep. Dennis Apuan.

“He didn’t give those two kids a second chance back in 1997, did he?”

 

Mayor continues to press CDOT for highway funding

December 20th, 2012, 4:41 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach

Colorado Springs and the Pikes Peak Region aren’t getting their fair share of funding from the Colorado Department of Transportation.

So says Mayor Steve Bach, who has been sounding the alarm since he was took office.

On Thursday, he sent the following letter to CDOT Executive Director Don Hunt and Colorado Springs businessman Les Gruen, who serves on the state Transportation Commission:

December 20, 2012

Mr. Les Gruen                                                                       Mr. Don Hunt

Transportation Commissioner                                         Executive Director

Colorado State Transportation Commission                 Colorado Department of Transportation

6 S Tejon, Suite 550                                                             4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Room 262

Colorado Springs, CO  80903                                           Denver, Colorado  80222

 

Gentlemen:

Thank you for our conference call conversation last Friday, December 14th.  To confirm, we have four (4) State highway-related, urgent public safety matters here where your help is needed.  Specifically:

1)       Cimarron Interchange with I 25.  This is a very dangerous, winding section of I-25 with recurring traffic accidents.  The local jurisdictions, through the PPACG, have provided $4M in Metro Funds for the advanced purchase of ROW prior to any CDOT funding of the interchange.  CDOT has now provided $7M for preliminary design of the interchange.  An additional $95M is needed from CDOT to complete construction.

2)       Fillmore Interchange with I 25.  Traffic during rush hour backs up onto the through lanes both Northbound and Southbound.  The City has committed nearly $7M to the planning, design, and construction of the relocation of Chestnut Street, which is required for the completion of a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI).  The estimated CDOT cost to complete the DDI is an additional $11M.

3)       Old Ranch Road Bridges at Powers Boulevard.  We’ve had multiple fatalities at this currently on grade intersection.  The City has agreed to fund this project in its entirety using PPRTA funds.  The estimated cost is $8M.  CDOT staff has discussed funding this project in advance of the PPRTA schedule with a four year payback from the City.

4)       Stewart Avenue Interchange with Powers Boulevard.  Traffic during rush hour backs up onto the through lanes both Northbound and Southbound.  The City performed capacity analysis of the existing Powers/Airport intersection and found that adequate capacity for the short-term future (10 years) could be provided with the addition of a through lane in each direction on Powers Boulevard south of Platte Avenue.  CDOT staff has agreed with this concept and is planning to fund this improvement with $10M committed FASTER funds.

Please let us know as soon as possible the approximate start dates for these projects.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

 

Steve Bach

Mayor

 

Cc: Members, Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus

Members, Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments Board of Directors

Members, Colorado Springs City Council

 

Attachment:  Distribution List

Distribution List for Mayor Bach 12.20.12 letter to Messrs. Les Gruen and Don Hunt

 

Members, Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus

Mayor Blair Bartling – Town of Calhan

Mayor Bruce Brown – City of Cripple Creek

Mayor Travis Easton – Town of Monument

Mayor Buck Hakes – City of Victor

Mayor Jeri Howells – City of Fountain

Commission Chair Jim Ignatious – Teller County Commissioners

Commission Chair Amy Lathen – El Paso County Commissioners

Mayor Nikki McDonald – Town of Palmer Lake

Mayor Marc Snyder – City of Manitou Springs

Mayor Dave Turley – City of Woodland Park

Mayor Lorrie Worthey – Town of Green Mountain Falls

 

Members, Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments Board of Directors

Chair Commissioner Sallie Clark

First Vice Chair Commissioner Dennis Hisey

Second Vice Chair Councilmember Scott Hente

Secretary Trustee Tyler Stevens

Treasurer Commissioner Jim Ignatious

 

Members, City of Colorado Springs City Council

Councilor Merv Bennett

Councilor Lisa Czelatdko

Councilor Angela Dougan

President Scott Hente

Councilor Bernie Herpin

Councilor Tim Leigh

President Pro Tem Jan Martin

Councilor Val Snider

Councilor Brandy Williams

Hente invites Bach to see budget process firsthand

October 16th, 2012, 4:22 pm by

On Friday, Mayor Steve Bach sent Scott Hente two separate letters offering recommendations to make the Colorado Springs Utilities budget process better.

The two letters basically said the same thing, but one was addressed to Hente as the City Council president and the other as the chairman of the Utilities Board.

Hente responded to the mayor’s letters Monday.

Hente sent only one letter.

Here is the full text of that letter:

October 16, 2012

 

Honorable Mayor Steve Bach

City Administration Building

Suite 601, MC 610

 

Dear Steve,

Thank you for your recent letters regarding the Colorado Springs Utilities budget and process. I, along with my colleagues, appreciate your input.

Colorado Springs Utilities has always been committed to discussing its budget in an open forum and provides much of the information you suggested, including placing   all materials and videos of past Utilities Board meetings online for public viewing. In addition, every December the Board adopts, by vote, (and publishes) a planning calendar for the upcoming year which outlines expected reports and decisions required at each meeting. This ensures that the Board receives regular presentations on the budget and financial conditions, and provides a public record to our ratepayers so that they know, with sufficient notification, when they can comment on the budget. Last year was no different.

For example, in July of each year, staff presents the Financial Planning and Budgeting overview for the upcoming five years. The report presented at the July 18, 2012 Utilities Board meeting included the 2013 – 2017 projections by year on debt, days cash on hand, customer energy and water sales/consumption, planned capital projects, and programs and other projections. This report, as is the case for all reports and presentations dealing with the budget, was made in an open forum and was subject to public comment.

It is also important to note that Colorado Springs Utilities is not a municipal government and operates under a different planning and budgetary process. Unlike a municipal government budget, Colorado Springs Utilities’ budget is developed and presented in a specific accounting format that identifies the costs for providing services. This detailed format is used to develop an Annual Operating Plan (AOP) that is an integral part of the planning and budgeting process. The AOP provides financial data based on analysis of the current budget and a forecasted five-year financial plan. Once the AOP and budget is adopted, the Board holds the organization accountable through the CEO Performance Plan and Scorecard.

One other aspect that is significantly different is that the Utility budget is specifically tied to the utility rates that are regulated by the Colorado Springs City Council. The City Council, acting within its authority under both the State Constitution and the City Charter, has certain obligations with respect to public notification and the process in setting the rates.  The calendar approved by the Utility Board for each year ensures that the law is being followed with regards to the dates associated with the rate settings.

The draft of the Colorado Springs Utilities 2013 Annual Operating Plan and Budget was provided to Utilities Board members for preliminary review last week and posted on the Colorado Springs Utilities web site for public viewing.

Colorado Springs Utilities leadership will present the proposed 2013 AOP to the Utilities Board on Wednesday, October 17. No action will be taken at this meeting as City Council will be requested to consider and approve the annual budget, the appropriation of monies, and the identification of the annual sources of funds during the November Formal Council meetings. If approved, the Annual Operating Plan will become effective on January 1, 2013. The public is encouraged to attend and comment throughout this process.

The Utilities Board members have had several opportunities to participate in the 2013 budget process, including a public workshop on September 14. While not every Board member was able to attend the workshop, Jerry Forte and members of his executive team met with them individually to discuss the 2013 budget and approval process.

Thank you again for your comments and input. I hope you will consider attending the upcoming Utilities Board meeting and the subsequent Formal City Council meetings to see firsthand how the process works.  I’m confident you will walk away impressed with the operations and management of Colorado Springs Utilities.

Respectfully,

Scott Hente, President

Colorado Springs City Council

Which City Council members have smoked weed?

October 11th, 2012, 10:54 am by

City Council members inserted themselves into the statewide marijuana debate when they took up a resolution to oppose Amendment 64, which seeks to regulate pot like alcohol.

That got some people wondering: Have council members smoked pot? And if so, do they still smoke pot?

A few coughed up to trying weed.

Others said they’ve never touched it and never would.

A couple of councilmen were vague in their answers.

Here are their answers, all via email:

“In high school, I tried it with my four best friends in my home — yes mom was out of town,” Councilwoman Angela Dougan said.

“We had one joint. We all took a couple of puffs, and it was awful tasting. My thoughts were, ‘What a dumb thing and why would anyone do this?’  Never did it again,” she said.

“I have never used marijuana,” Councilman Merv Bennett said.

Bennett said the question posed to council was “very inappropriate.”

“The inappropriateness relates to asking a question that could lead to a criminal conviction.  It isn’t  a problem for me. I haven’t even smoked a cigarette,” Bennett said.

“As it relates to the debate, it is an Amendment to our State  Constitution that could have significant and serious implications to our City, the quality of life of our citizens, federal funding for roads and bridges, public safety, etc.  Something of that significance demands our attention,” Bennett added.

Like Bennett, Councilwoman Brandy Williams said she’s never smoked pot — or even a cigarette.

“I took D.A.R.E rather seriously,” she said, referring to the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program.

Councilman Val Snider took a page out of the Bill Clinton playbook.

“Does it count if you didn’t inhale?” Snider asked.

Councilman Tim Leigh was evasive in his answer.

“I saw your inquiry about council’s pot-smoking-propensity,” Leigh said in his first response.

“While I cannot state with absolute equivocation, it seems we’re all dipping in the medicine on about every other Tuesday afternoon, just after the lunch hour.  That will likely come to an abrupt and unfettered halt when the Mayor (with my full endorsement) creates a no-smoking zone in Acacia Park,” he said.

When pressed for an answer, Leigh continued to be evasive.

“Puff the Magic Dragon, lived by the sea, Frolicked in the autumn mist in a a land called Hana Leigh,” he wrote.

When asked if he was smoking pot when he came up with that response, Leigh, a fitness buff, offered this tidbit and hinted that he may be cover-boy material.

“I’m smoking, alright. I’m on the stair master at the club with Men’s Journal. Photo shoot. Something about my lung power and fitness!” he said.

Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko is out of town and did not respond.

The three council members who served on council before answered the question a few years ago.

Councilman Bernie Herpin said the only marijuana he had ever seen was on TV.

“Until I visited a dispensary, I had never actually seen marijuana in the flesh,” Herpin said.

Council President Scott Hente said he “never” smoked marijuana.

“Look where I graduated from,” said Hente, a retired lieutenant colonel who graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1975.

Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin said she tried it once and only once.

“I was so paranoid and looking over my shoulder the entire time that I decided it just wasn’t worth it and never tried it again,” she said. “That’s a very honest answer from a politician.”

By the way, Martin cast the lone dissenting vote on the resolution opposing Amendment 64.

“I wasn’t afraid of medical marijuana dispensaries, and I’m not afraid of this bill for marijuana in our community,” Martin said Tuesday.

The vote to pass the resolution was 5-1. Leigh refused to vote, saying the council isn’t in the business of making pronouncements.

Czelatdko and Williams were absent, though Williams said she would have voted with the majority.

 

Schuck apologizes to City Council president, says reporter may have been wired

September 24th, 2012, 10:36 am by

Developer Steve Schuck apologized Sunday to City Council President Scott Hente after a war of words sparked by a report that Schuck said that council members were “sitting on their asses doing nothing.”

“When approached prior to the meeting by the reporter, she had no writing materials and no visible recording device,” Schuck said about the reporter, who DOES NOT work for The Gazette, in an email to Hente.

“She never indicated that our discussion was an interview and that its content would be shared with the public.  Shame on me for trusting her and not properly protecting myself by limiting my comments to only those which were guarded and well thought out.  This ain’t my first rodeo.  It will be interesting, however, to hear her explanation of how she actually validates my so called quotes,” he wrote.

Regardless, Schuck said he was sorry for his “poor choice of words” and any offense they may have caused.

“No one better understands all you do or has more respect and appreciation for the commitment and sacrifices you and other members of Council make in order to serve our community.  Unlike most other elected officials, many of whom are handsomely compensated, you are true servants whose primary reward has to come from within,” he wrote.

Here is the full, unedited text of Schuck’s email to Hente:

scott

It is very unfortunate that others, one of whom may have questionable motivations, or worse, have functioned as intermediaries between us.  My choice is to communicate directly with you.

Let me start by apologizing for my poor choice of words and for any offense they caused. No one better understands all you do or has more respect and appreciation for the commitment and sacrifices you and other members of Council make in order to serve our community.  Unlike most other elected officials, many of whom are handsomely compensated, you are true servants whose primary reward has to come from within.

You may not be too surprised to learn that the quote attributed to me was both incomplete and seriously out of context.

When approached prior to the meeting by the reporter, she had no writing materials and no visible recording device.  She never indicated that our discussion was an interview and that its content would be shared with the public.  Shame on me for trusting her and not properly protecting myself by limiting my comments to only those which were guarded and well thought out.  This ain’t my first rodeo.  It will be interesting, however, to hear her explanation of how she actually validates my so called quotes.

Having apologized for the comments, let me change course and stand behind the message.  It has been my position for a long time that any decision about the future of CSU must first take into consideration the costs and benefits that every responsible alternative might generate.  You and a few other members of Council have already advocated an outcome, one that may or may not prove to ultimately be the best, without having the information that allows you to compare it to the others, assessing them all in an objective fashion with all available facts.  The objective of Thursday’s meeting was to start a process, one that would ultimately result in your receiving expert input about alternatives and the tradeoffs associated with each.  Why would you not want, or even demand, that information?   When challenged about ‘why are YOU doing this,” my response was that no one else was, so why not me? When challenged about “why now” and why not wait a year as was recommended by Council, my response was “why NOT now?”  Obviously you and the rest of Council came to the same conclusion on Wednesday.

As to your comments about me personally, they do not merit a response. My record and history speak for themselves.

Lastly, it is important to clarify the position of many of us towards tax increases and Tabor.  We are not Neanderthals, as you imply.  Rather, we are convinced that our City is on a perilous slide towards insolvency and  we can no longer afford to do business as usual.  If, after Mayor Bach has completed his transformation of city hall and squeezed out every possible unnecessary and counterproductive expense and cost, both financial and operational, there is still a need to enhance revenues, you will find me at the front of the line favoring them.   But not until, and unless, we have exhausted all options to reduce both direct and indirect expenses will some of us swallow and prescribe the distasteful pill of draining resources from those who deploy them most efficiently. Our economy remains in crisis, unemployment in the Springs is almost 10 percent and most taxpayers are already struggling. This is no time to even consider raising taxes.

Despite our differences on some matters of policy, Scott, please know of my gratitude and admiration for all you do and for your outstanding service.  should you wish to visit directly at any time, please just let me know.

Best regards

steve

Quote of the Day

September 21st, 2012, 12:30 pm by

Colorado Springs Utilities is all the talk these days, and everybody seems to have a iron in the fire, including Mayor Steve Bach.

But under the new form of government, it’s the City Council — not the mayor — that oversees the $1.1 billion city enterprise.

So, what does council President Scott Hente think about Bach’s constant involvement with the four-service utility?

“The mayor has the right as any citizen in this community does to express his opinions about any of the services that our municipality provides. However, he tells me on a very frequent basis that some things are the responsibility of the executive branch of this community. You know what? I respect that, so if some things are the responsibility of the executive branch of this community, then some things are the responsibility of the legislative branch of this community and Utilities is one of them. So, I guess what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

 

Date of special meeting on Drake up in the air

September 17th, 2012, 8:33 am by

Photo courtesy of Nick Kittle

City Council President Scott Hente said he will schedule a special meeting to get public input on an experimental emissions control technology at the coal-fired Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

But he said last week that it probably won’t be on Sept. 26 as requested by four of his colleagues because that’s the day of Yum Kippur, the holiest day of the year for the Jews.

“I’ve already had at least one constituent come to me and say, ‘I’d really like to come. Please don’t schedule this on my highest of holy days,’” Hente said last week.

“I wouldn’t schedule a meeting on Christmas Day,” he said.

Hente said he has to call the meeting but believes he has the “leeway” to set the date and time.

“I called Scott to confirm his plans on changing the date because I did not hear it from him, and he confirmed it with stating he only had to give 24 hours notice,” City Councilwoman Angela Dougan said today on Facebook.

“He also stated he planned on making a decision today, and I asked if he would share that decision with me so I could get it out to the interested community, and he said yes,” she added. “So, stay tuned. Date and time may change but I will do my best to insure (sic) the public knows.”

Bach hopes council reverses decision on Drake

July 26th, 2012, 1:49 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach said Thursday he hopes the City Council will reverse its decision to move ahead with plans to install “experimental” emissions control technology at the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

Last week, the council, acting as the Utilities Board, voted 7-2 to proceed with plans to install a pollutant-removing technology invented by Colorado Springs-based Neumann Systems Group. The technology is designed to clean sulfur dioxide from coal-burning power plants.

The council also voted to delay until 2013 a $500,000 study to look at decommissioning Drake, which was built in 1925 with two 2.5 megawatt generators.​ The plant

Councilwoman Angela Dougan and Brandy Williams voted in opposition.

“What’s the point of doing the study if they’re going to go ahead and upgrade the plant? It makes no sense,” Bach said on the Richard Randall radio show on KVOR.

Randall asked the mayor how he would respond to critics who would question why he was getting involved in matters pertaining to Colorado Springs Utilities  when the utility company is overseen by council.

Bach pointed to his involvement with Memorial Health System, which is also under the purview of council.

“I think the voters expect the mayor to weigh in on matters of general importance to the community,” he said.

“I’m trying very hard not to interfere, not to micromanage or get in the way. But I think the future of our utilities is so important that folks, I think, want the mayor to weigh in,” he said.

Bach said he sent council a letter June 5 asking council to hold up on the expansion of Martin Drake “until we can, all of us, get comfortable with what’s the right direction.”

Bach said council has yet to respond to his letter.

“Respectfully, I’m just saying that I hope city council will reverse its recent decision to move forward with that technology until we can all be comfortable with the answer,” he said.

Williams said she’s heard unofficial discussions about reopening the debate over the power plant’s future.

“I know that phone calls are being made because people in the community are a little concerned what happened last time,” Williams said.

Williams said she was concerned that council didn’t have all of the research and information on the costs of shifting the Neumann system to the Ray Nixon Power Plant before it voted, and that it voted against the recommendation of Utilities’ staff to make the switch to Nixon while Drake’s future was discussed.

“We didn’t take our own best option,” Williams said.

However, Council President Scott Hente said he hasn’t heard any talks about taking another look at Drake and that he doesn’t think doing so would be fair to Neumann Systems Group.

“When we said, ‘Continue,’ I’m sure Neumann Systems started putting more money into it,” Hente said. “I’m not sure I want to keep jerking them around.”

Hente said Bach hasn’t spoken with him about the board’s decision.

Bach said the council’s decision reflects on past practices at City Hall.

“This is (an) example of whether we want to continue to do business as usual or whether we want to transform city government to be more efficient and more effective,” he said.

“I’m not talking about anything other than I believe we do not need Martin Drake Power Plant capacity. When we hit peak load in this city, we barely get into needing Martin Drake from what I’m told by people who are experts in that business outside of Colorado Springs Utilities. Now that needs to be fact checked,” he said.

“I’m also told that we could buy peak power from other providers, far less expensively than maintaining a 50-year-old power plant and upgrading it to the tune of $250 million. Shouldn’t we look at that?”

Utilities spokeswoman Natalie Eckhart said the $250 million cost is if Utilities converts both Drake and Nixon.

“The cost for Drake is $121 million,” she said.

Eckhart also said the community relies on Drake for its electricity.

“The statement that says that we barely use it is absolutely not true,” she said.

Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin said council decided July 18 that keeping Drake open offered the lowest costs for Utilities’ ratepayers.

“I think we just can’t continue to go back and forth on these decisions,” Martin said. “I’m comfortable we made the best decision last Wednesday to move forward with Neumann and Drake.”