City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Utilities' Category

Colorado Springs Utilities offers winter watering tips

December 17th, 2012, 11:03 am by

Precipitation — or the lack of precipitation — is going to be big in 2013.

Colorado Springs Utilities, which provides monthly updates on the water situation, told the Utilities Board last week that outdoor watering restrictions and maybe even a water rate increase may be needed next year.

In the meantime, the city-owned utility is offering the following winter water tips:

Winter watering

If you’ve ever experienced the discouragement of lawn winter kill or dead landscape plants in spring, try winter watering. Even though landscape plants are dormant and brown, they need to be watered periodically. Dry winter months often kill plants through dehydration. By winter watering, your lawn and landscape plants will have a much better chance of greening up beautifully when the warm weather of spring returns.

A word to the wise, too. Shrubs and trees that don’t receive regular water will search for hydration on their own, oftentimes in your wastewater pipes. Roots are a common cause of pipe damage, and repairs can be messy and costly. Service lines are the homeowner’s responsibility, so have pipes checked at least once a year or more if you live in a long-established, heavily-treed neighborhood.

Finally, keep in mind that your wastewater bill is calculated using the amount of water used Dec. 1 through the last day of February.

When to water

– Choose a warm winter day with air temperature above 40 degrees F and unfrozen soil.

– Water one to two times per month from November to April.

– It is most critical to water in March and April when the new roots are forming.

– Water at mid-day so it can soak in before it freezes.

What to water

– It is most important to water newly planted lawns, trees, shrubs and flowers.

– Established lawn areas and trees, especially those in sunny, windy, or exposed areas should also be a high priority.

– Established shrubs, flowers, ornamental grasses and groundcovers will also benefit.

– Do not winter water cacti, succulents, buffalograss, blue grama and very xeric plants.

How to water

– Use a hose-end sprinkler or watering wand since automatic sprinkler systems are off during the winter.

– Remove the hose from the spigot after watering to prevent freeze damage.

– Water slowly so it can soak in.

– To figure out how long to water, put out cups to catch some of the water. Water until you can measure 0.5 to 1” deep in the cups.

Water leaks turn drops into dollars

Some facts about water leaks from the Environmental Protection Agency:

– Leaks can account for, on average, 10,000 gallons of water wasted in the home every year, which is enough to fill a backyard swimming pool.

– The amount of water leaked from U.S. homes could exceed more than 1 trillion gallons per year. That’s equivalent to the annual water use of Los Angeles, Chicago, and Miami combined.

– Ten percent of homes have leaks that waste 90 gallons or more per day.

– Common types of leaks found in the home include leaking toilet flappers, dripping faucets, and other leaking valves. All are easily correctable.

– Fixing easily corrected household water leaks can save homeowners more than 10 percent on their water bills.

– Keep your home leak-free by repairing dripping faucets, toilet valves, and showerheads. In most cases, fixture replacement parts don’t require a major investment and can be installed by do-it-yourselfers.

– The vast majority of leaks can be eliminated after retrofitting a household with new WaterSense labeled fixtures and other high-efficiency appliances.

 

Quote of the Day

December 14th, 2012, 5:50 pm by

Sean Paige

Mayor Steve Bach didn’t name names during a press conference Friday, but he’s obviously a little peeved at Sean Paige, a former city councilman who now works at deputy state director for Americans for Prosperity.

Paige has been raising concerns about what he called “secret” negotiations between the city and the Sierra Club.

This week, Paige sent out an email in which he said the mayor was apparently using City Attorney Chris Melcher to enter into negotiations with the Sierra Club that may effectively undermine, negate or reverse a course of action which a Utilities Board majority has approved.

During the press conference, Bach said a “pundit” had “impugned” Melcher’s integrity.

Council acting as the utility board directed Mr. Melcher to meet with the Sierra Club. You can fact check that. He did not do that on his own. He has not been freelancing as has been suggested,” Bach said.

 

 

Bach to flip switch on last darkened streetlight

December 10th, 2012, 9:55 am by

Can somebody call Diane Sawyer?

Three years ago, Colorado Springs was thrust into the media spotlight when city officials decided turned off nearly 8,000 streetlights, among other drastic cost-cutting measures, because of budget constraints.

After tonight, all the darkened streetlights will be back on.

The development is unlikely to generate as much publicity, but Mayor Steve Bach is inviting the media to watch him “flip the switch” on the last darkened streetlight at 5 p.m. Monday.

The streetlight is on the northwest corner of Academy Boulevard and Constitution Avenue, according to the mayor’s office.

“Restoring the remaining 3,500 streetlights is one of the key community benefits in the city’s 2013 budget,” Bach said in a statement.

“With additional savings from 2012, we are glad to be able to restore this service to the citizens before the New Year,” he said.

Here’s some background from the city:

In 2009, the city turned off about 8,000 streetlights to save money.  All residential streetlights were flipped back on in 2010. After tonight, all remaining arterial lights will be back on.

“Budget savings from 2012, including salary savings from not filling vacant positions, helped fund the $150,000 needed to turn the lights back on,” the city said. “The electric cost to keep the remaining 3,500 lights on will be approximately $100,000 annually.”

While all the streetlights are supposed to be back on, the city cautioned that some may still be dark “due to copper wire theft or other maintenance issues.”

 

 

 

Which groups are pocketing YOUR ratepayer dollars?

November 20th, 2012, 11:42 am by

Should city-owned Colorado Springs Utilities be handing out ratepayer money to groups such as the NAACP and the Colorado Springs Regional Business Alliance?

The utility budgeted about $774,000 to hand out to various organizations and charities in 2013, raising the ire of some Utilities Board members.

“The greater question pointed out by these gifts and the gift-giving process leads to the overall structure of the board and the built-in conflict of interest presented by being both a city councilor and a utility company board member,” Councilman Tim Leigh recently wrote in his electronic newsletter.

“As a utility company board member I understand and condone the giving.  I encourage it.  As a company, the million dollar give-away is chump change used to curry small-time political favor.  I understand the process,” he said.

“But as a city councilor looking out for Fred the Plumber and his good wife Ethel and their 3 kids living in a poorly insulated, small duplex on the east side, I’m compelled to call-out the unfairness of arbitrary gifts of rate payer dollars. ”

Click here to see the list of groups that are poised to receive ratepayer money and the amount.

The Gazette asked Springs Utilities to provide more information about the “Community Focus Fund” program.

Here is their response:

As a citizen-owned utility, we are committed to giving back to the community we serve.  Our community investments programs include investments in community organizations that retain, grow, and recruit businesses in our region;  grants through the Community Focus Fund program; support of designated City Sponsored events; sponsorships of local non-profit events and memberships in local community associations.

Community investment provides financial support for activities and events in the community or in communities impacted by Springs Utilities operations.  Utilities Board policy requires us to demonstrate strong corporate responsibility and be responsive to community needs and values.  Community investment is limited to financial contributions which are budgeted as annual operating expense derived from operating revenues.  We are able to invest no more than 1/4 of one percent of budgeted operations revenues in support of the community.  Our budgeted amount is actually about 1/10 of one percent. The small increase in the 2013 budget covers increased costs in city-sponsored events and realignment of funding to meet community needs.

Community investments were first formalized in 1997 with the chartering of the Community Focus Fund by City Council. The Community Focus Fund was established as a community outreach program to support employee volunteerism and provide financial support to local nonprofit organizations and schools.  The program is managed by an employee steering committee of about 20 employees from throughout the organization who make volunteer project and funding decisions based on the program’s charter and guidelines. Funding and volunteering is focused on affordable housing assistance, community, education, environment, safety & health, senior citizens, youth.  Funds are also used to purchase supplies and equipment for employee volunteer projects.

Sponsorship funding is determined by a management team to support organizations and events that have a strong alignment with Springs Utilities’ business objectives such as workplace diversity, conservation and the environment, safety, renewable energy, science education or in support of events where Springs Utilities employees have made significant volunteer commitments to organizations as members of the board of directors.

Funds are also used to fulfill requests from City Council to underwrite the cost of barricades for designated city sponsored events such as the USA Pro Cycling Challenge, parades, etc.

In addition, our primary focus is supporting employee volunteerism.  Year after year, we donate thousands of personal hours to local charities and nonprofit agencies to help make our community a better place.  In 2011, our volunteer hours topped 25,000.

Utilities pitches scrubbers but gets no responses

October 29th, 2012, 10:01 am by

David Neumann, founder and CEO of Neumann Systems Group, poses with boxes that are a part of the system the company manufactures to scrub sulphur out of exhaust gas. Photo by Mark Reis, The Gazette

Colorado Springs Utilities is trying to drum up business for the local company that invented sulfur dioxide scrubbers that are now at the center of a community debate about the future of the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

But so far, no one has called back.

In September, Chief Energy Services Officer Bruce McCormick sent a letter to 10 utilities with coal-fired power plants in Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wisconsin, Kansas, Missouri, Utah and Iowa touting Neumann Systems Group’s wet flue gas desulfurization system.

“We chose NeuStream®-S scrubbers because we thought NSG represented the best technology and best value for our ratepayers. We still do,” McCormick wrote in the one-page letter.

“Based on our success to date, we are happy to have partnered with NSG in this effort, and recommend them highly as a smart, honest, responsive, and cooperative partner for your flue gas desulfurization needs,” he wrote.

The letter was obtained by The Gazette under an open-records request.

The purpose of the letter was to “generate awareness and interest in the NeuStream solution among utilities with similar emissions control needs,” Utilities spokesman Dave Grossman said in an email.

“The effort supports the 3 percent sales assistance fee portion of the agreement with Neumann Systems Group,” he added.

Under the agreement with Nuemann, Colorado Springs Utilities stands to make 3 percent on the company’s gross sales of its scrubbers for 10 years.

McCormick’s letter apparently didn’t generate much interest.

“Bruce has not yet been contacted by any of the utilities,” Grossman said.

Here is the full text of the letter and its recipients:

August ___, 2012

 

<<NAME>>

<<TITLE, UTILITY COMPANY>>

<<ADDRESS1>>

<<ADDRESS2>>

RE:       Support for Neumann Systems Group’s wet Flue Gas Desulfurization

Dear <<Utility CEO>>,

You may know that Colorado Springs Utilities is more than 60% complete on a $73.5M contract to design and construct SO2 scrubbers on our Martin Drake power plant located near downtown Colorado Springs.  We have contracted Neumann Systems Group, Inc. (NSG) to design and build two full-scale NeuStream®-S scrubbers (combined 227 MW).  Colorado Springs Utilities has invested approximately $50 million in research and development services with NSG for the design, building, testing, and operation of separate, escalating 2 MW and 20 MW pilot plants to test and develop NSG NeuStream® multi-pollutant control technology.  Scrubber construction is due to start later this year for a fully operational system in 2014.

I am pleased with the outstanding results NSG has obtained across the spectrum of air pollutants, from SO2 to CO2 capture, in a series of relatively low-cost retrofit systems with small “footprints.”   Our internal testing of SO2 capture, verified by EPRI, shows the NeuStream®-S scrubbers:

– Capture 97% of SO2 from our PRB coal-fired power plants,

– Are extremely reliable, exceeding our two-year continuous operation requirement,

– Are capable of handling either high- or low-sulfur coal,

– Use about one-fourth to one-half as much water as competing desulfurization systems,

– Use about one-half as much parasitic power as competing systems (~1%),

– Cost about half the CapEx and OpEx of wet FGD (limestone forced oxidation) and Dry FGD (lime spray dryer) on the market, and

– Require about one-tenth the absorber volume of competing desulfurization systems.

We chose NeuStream®-S scrubbers because we thought NSG represented the best technology and best value for our ratepayers.  We still do.   Based on our success to date, we are happy to have partnered with NSG in this effort, and recommend them highly as a smart, honest, responsive, and cooperative partner for your flue gas desulfurization needs.

Sincerely,

Bruce McCormick, P.E.

Chief Energy Services Officer

Hente invites Bach to see budget process firsthand

October 16th, 2012, 4:22 pm by

On Friday, Mayor Steve Bach sent Scott Hente two separate letters offering recommendations to make the Colorado Springs Utilities budget process better.

The two letters basically said the same thing, but one was addressed to Hente as the City Council president and the other as the chairman of the Utilities Board.

Hente responded to the mayor’s letters Monday.

Hente sent only one letter.

Here is the full text of that letter:

October 16, 2012

 

Honorable Mayor Steve Bach

City Administration Building

Suite 601, MC 610

 

Dear Steve,

Thank you for your recent letters regarding the Colorado Springs Utilities budget and process. I, along with my colleagues, appreciate your input.

Colorado Springs Utilities has always been committed to discussing its budget in an open forum and provides much of the information you suggested, including placing   all materials and videos of past Utilities Board meetings online for public viewing. In addition, every December the Board adopts, by vote, (and publishes) a planning calendar for the upcoming year which outlines expected reports and decisions required at each meeting. This ensures that the Board receives regular presentations on the budget and financial conditions, and provides a public record to our ratepayers so that they know, with sufficient notification, when they can comment on the budget. Last year was no different.

For example, in July of each year, staff presents the Financial Planning and Budgeting overview for the upcoming five years. The report presented at the July 18, 2012 Utilities Board meeting included the 2013 – 2017 projections by year on debt, days cash on hand, customer energy and water sales/consumption, planned capital projects, and programs and other projections. This report, as is the case for all reports and presentations dealing with the budget, was made in an open forum and was subject to public comment.

It is also important to note that Colorado Springs Utilities is not a municipal government and operates under a different planning and budgetary process. Unlike a municipal government budget, Colorado Springs Utilities’ budget is developed and presented in a specific accounting format that identifies the costs for providing services. This detailed format is used to develop an Annual Operating Plan (AOP) that is an integral part of the planning and budgeting process. The AOP provides financial data based on analysis of the current budget and a forecasted five-year financial plan. Once the AOP and budget is adopted, the Board holds the organization accountable through the CEO Performance Plan and Scorecard.

One other aspect that is significantly different is that the Utility budget is specifically tied to the utility rates that are regulated by the Colorado Springs City Council. The City Council, acting within its authority under both the State Constitution and the City Charter, has certain obligations with respect to public notification and the process in setting the rates.  The calendar approved by the Utility Board for each year ensures that the law is being followed with regards to the dates associated with the rate settings.

The draft of the Colorado Springs Utilities 2013 Annual Operating Plan and Budget was provided to Utilities Board members for preliminary review last week and posted on the Colorado Springs Utilities web site for public viewing.

Colorado Springs Utilities leadership will present the proposed 2013 AOP to the Utilities Board on Wednesday, October 17. No action will be taken at this meeting as City Council will be requested to consider and approve the annual budget, the appropriation of monies, and the identification of the annual sources of funds during the November Formal Council meetings. If approved, the Annual Operating Plan will become effective on January 1, 2013. The public is encouraged to attend and comment throughout this process.

The Utilities Board members have had several opportunities to participate in the 2013 budget process, including a public workshop on September 14. While not every Board member was able to attend the workshop, Jerry Forte and members of his executive team met with them individually to discuss the 2013 budget and approval process.

Thank you again for your comments and input. I hope you will consider attending the upcoming Utilities Board meeting and the subsequent Formal City Council meetings to see firsthand how the process works.  I’m confident you will walk away impressed with the operations and management of Colorado Springs Utilities.

Respectfully,

Scott Hente, President

Colorado Springs City Council

Landlord: Bach gives public ‘greater voice’ at Utilities

October 16th, 2012, 9:19 am by

The people of Colorado Springs have a “greater voice” on issues involving Colorado Springs Utilities since Mayor Steve Bach came into office.

That’s the gist of an email that a Colorado Springs landlord sent to the city’s Communications Office Tuesday morning.

“We live in Georgia for now, and I wish I was there to review the CSU budget and speak up about CSU budgets in front of Council.  When I lived there, we made an effort, but CSU was always stronger than the public comments and typically got what they wanted,” Marge McCarthy said in the email.

“From what I have read about the Strong Mayor, and the new transparencies, I think the public has a greater voice,” she said.

The Communications Office shared the email with The Gazette and other print media.

“I know that there are some print folks writing about Utilities issues right now, so I just wanted to pass (it) along,” city spokesman Jarred Rego said in a telephone interview.

Here is the full text of the email:

Bravo!

Even though I don’t live in CS right now, we own a home there that we rent.  We wrote into our lease that we will pay 30% of water during the summer months in an effort to keep the tenants watering the lawn.

We live in Georgia for now, and I wish I was there to review the CSU budget and speak up about CSU budgets in front of Council.  When I lived there, we made an effort, but CSU was always stronger than the public comments and typically got what they wanted.

From what I have read about the Strong Mayor, and the new transparencies, I think the public has a greater voice.

In August, I came back to get our home ready for new tenants.  For about 3 weeks in August, we placed utilities in our name and the bill for 3 weeks was just under $400.  It was quite a shock, but somewhat expected.  The September portion of WATER ONLY from the tenants’ utilities bill is $170, that is water only. (I wish we could xeriscape more, but the appeal is to have a yard that is user friendly, so that is what we have…bluegrass.)

Anyway, CS always used to boast about low utility costs, but somewhere along the line that went out the window.  I would love to have the opportunity to review the CSU budget and find savings, but I don’t live there right now and doubt anyone would listen to me from Georgia, even though we plan to move back someday.

I am grateful to Mayor Bach for being a Strong Mayor. The moniker fits and I like the changes that I have read about.

Carry on,

Marge McCarthy

 

Schuck apologizes to City Council president, says reporter may have been wired

September 24th, 2012, 10:36 am by

Developer Steve Schuck apologized Sunday to City Council President Scott Hente after a war of words sparked by a report that Schuck said that council members were “sitting on their asses doing nothing.”

“When approached prior to the meeting by the reporter, she had no writing materials and no visible recording device,” Schuck said about the reporter, who DOES NOT work for The Gazette, in an email to Hente.

“She never indicated that our discussion was an interview and that its content would be shared with the public.  Shame on me for trusting her and not properly protecting myself by limiting my comments to only those which were guarded and well thought out.  This ain’t my first rodeo.  It will be interesting, however, to hear her explanation of how she actually validates my so called quotes,” he wrote.

Regardless, Schuck said he was sorry for his “poor choice of words” and any offense they may have caused.

“No one better understands all you do or has more respect and appreciation for the commitment and sacrifices you and other members of Council make in order to serve our community.  Unlike most other elected officials, many of whom are handsomely compensated, you are true servants whose primary reward has to come from within,” he wrote.

Here is the full, unedited text of Schuck’s email to Hente:

scott

It is very unfortunate that others, one of whom may have questionable motivations, or worse, have functioned as intermediaries between us.  My choice is to communicate directly with you.

Let me start by apologizing for my poor choice of words and for any offense they caused. No one better understands all you do or has more respect and appreciation for the commitment and sacrifices you and other members of Council make in order to serve our community.  Unlike most other elected officials, many of whom are handsomely compensated, you are true servants whose primary reward has to come from within.

You may not be too surprised to learn that the quote attributed to me was both incomplete and seriously out of context.

When approached prior to the meeting by the reporter, she had no writing materials and no visible recording device.  She never indicated that our discussion was an interview and that its content would be shared with the public.  Shame on me for trusting her and not properly protecting myself by limiting my comments to only those which were guarded and well thought out.  This ain’t my first rodeo.  It will be interesting, however, to hear her explanation of how she actually validates my so called quotes.

Having apologized for the comments, let me change course and stand behind the message.  It has been my position for a long time that any decision about the future of CSU must first take into consideration the costs and benefits that every responsible alternative might generate.  You and a few other members of Council have already advocated an outcome, one that may or may not prove to ultimately be the best, without having the information that allows you to compare it to the others, assessing them all in an objective fashion with all available facts.  The objective of Thursday’s meeting was to start a process, one that would ultimately result in your receiving expert input about alternatives and the tradeoffs associated with each.  Why would you not want, or even demand, that information?   When challenged about ‘why are YOU doing this,” my response was that no one else was, so why not me? When challenged about “why now” and why not wait a year as was recommended by Council, my response was “why NOT now?”  Obviously you and the rest of Council came to the same conclusion on Wednesday.

As to your comments about me personally, they do not merit a response. My record and history speak for themselves.

Lastly, it is important to clarify the position of many of us towards tax increases and Tabor.  We are not Neanderthals, as you imply.  Rather, we are convinced that our City is on a perilous slide towards insolvency and  we can no longer afford to do business as usual.  If, after Mayor Bach has completed his transformation of city hall and squeezed out every possible unnecessary and counterproductive expense and cost, both financial and operational, there is still a need to enhance revenues, you will find me at the front of the line favoring them.   But not until, and unless, we have exhausted all options to reduce both direct and indirect expenses will some of us swallow and prescribe the distasteful pill of draining resources from those who deploy them most efficiently. Our economy remains in crisis, unemployment in the Springs is almost 10 percent and most taxpayers are already struggling. This is no time to even consider raising taxes.

Despite our differences on some matters of policy, Scott, please know of my gratitude and admiration for all you do and for your outstanding service.  should you wish to visit directly at any time, please just let me know.

Best regards

steve

Quote of the Day

September 21st, 2012, 12:30 pm by

Colorado Springs Utilities is all the talk these days, and everybody seems to have a iron in the fire, including Mayor Steve Bach.

But under the new form of government, it’s the City Council — not the mayor — that oversees the $1.1 billion city enterprise.

So, what does council President Scott Hente think about Bach’s constant involvement with the four-service utility?

“The mayor has the right as any citizen in this community does to express his opinions about any of the services that our municipality provides. However, he tells me on a very frequent basis that some things are the responsibility of the executive branch of this community. You know what? I respect that, so if some things are the responsibility of the executive branch of this community, then some things are the responsibility of the legislative branch of this community and Utilities is one of them. So, I guess what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.”

 

Is Skorman angry at Herpin over joke?

September 21st, 2012, 11:00 am by

When City Councilman Bernie Herpin joked Wednesday that Richard Skorman’s ashes could be spread at the coal-fired power plant downtown when he died, some people laughed.

Others thought it was in poor taste.

So, what did Skorman think?

Skorman said Friday that he thought Herpin’s remark was funny.

“I didn’t take it seriously. I knew he was doing it in jest,” Skorman said.

“I didn’t laugh because I was too involved in what I was talking about, but I thought it was a pretty good joke,” he added.