City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Amy Lathen' Tag

Lathen says Amendment 64 campaign was ‘deceptive’

December 18th, 2012, 9:43 pm by

Amy Lathen

Amendment 64, which Colorado voters approved in November, decriminalizes the consumption and possession of less than an ounce of marijuana by adults ages 21 and up.

The amendment states that the first $40 million annually from a new excise tax on marijuana sales would be devoted to education capital construction. But the excise tax must be approved by the voters, and it takes a two-thirds majority of the Legislature to get such a measure onto the ballot. That means that the $40 million may never be realized if voters turn down the tax question next year, according to statehouse reporter John Schroyer.

During Tuesday’s Board of County Commissioner’s meeting, Chairwoman Amy Lathen said a “huge portion” of the campaign in support of Amendment 64 was “just a complete lie” to voters.

“I have no problem in saying that,” she said. “Telling people that we’re going to get have these great taxes for schools when it takes another very arduous process to do so, I think, is deceptive. There’s no question that that was deceptive in the campaign.”

 

Lathen calls Bach’s comments ‘ridiculous’

July 18th, 2012, 3:09 pm by

Amy Lathen

Mayor Steve Bach said Wednesday that El Paso County Commission Chair Amy Lathen asked him to subordinate his authority to the county during the Waldo Canyon fire.

“At one point I was asked by the county commissioners if I would sign a document that would basically subordinate the city’s authority if the fire came into the city. I declined to do that,” he said during the Mayor’s Counsel meeting.

In an interview afterward, Bach said he brought up the issue because city officials were talking about “lessons learned” from the fire.

“I’m not sure why that question was asked” by the county, he said.

“The reason I brought that up today … is we need to have a, frankly, a playbook. We need to have a game plan for matters like that,” he said.

Lathen said it was “categorically untrue” that she asked Bach to subordinate his authority to the county.

“In no way, shape or form was it ever asking the city to hand over authority to the county. Ever,” she said.

“That’s ridiculous. That’s ridiculous,” she added. “We were trying to coordinate everything through unified command, and we were learning as we were going along.”

Lathen said she called the mayor the night the fire started and invited him to go to the emergency operations center, where they were signing a “delegation of authority.”

That delegation of authority assigns authority to a unified command and “enables” emergency fire funds, she said.

“The city, they had a choice to do whatever they wanted to do, but it was in their best interest to sign that delegation so that the cost of the fire goes through that federal process. It had nothing whatsoever to do with county taking control. I’m kind of surprised because he understood that the next day” and signed the document, Lathen said.

Here’s video of an interview with the mayor:

YouTube Preview Image

Bach wants ‘fair share’ of state transportation dollars

May 24th, 2012, 11:38 am by

The Pikes Peak region isn’t getting a fair share of transportation dollars from the state.

That’s the gist of a letter that the Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus sent Tuesday to Don Hunt, executive director of the Colorado Department of Transportation.

“The members of the Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus have reviewed the information contained in your May 14, 2012 email to Mayor Steve Bach, regarding funding percentages for the Pikes Peak region,” the letter states.

“We are in agreement with the facts contained in the email and believe the email supports our conclusions that the Pikes Peak region has not received its fair share of funding,” it states.

Here’s the email that Hunt sent to Bach on May 14:

Steve,

Just to reiterate a few items from our call:

– I was going to bring the table below to the meeting.  It now includes FY12 with the additional I-25 funding that was allocated by the Commission as “off the top.”  It shows that the additional $30M for I-25 essentially moved the running six year average from 7.06% to 7.47%.

– If we don’t have staff agreement on this methodology and results, then I would say a meeting with me and the mayors on Friday might have limited benefit.  If our respective staffs can’t agree on the methodology, then we have other challenges.

Not trying to interpret how the MOUs work, but comparing the three Front Range MPOs, helped me get a general feel for funding:

– The DRCOG region has 57% of the state population, and in FY12 it received 48.4% of state funding.

– The PPACG region has 12% of the state population, an in FY12 it received 10.3% of state funding (the six year average of 7.46% duly noted).

– The North Front Range MPO has 9% of the state population, and in FY12 it received 6.1% of state funding.

– The rest of the state has 22% of the state population, and in FY12 it received 35.3% of funding.

As the CDOT budget has been reduced to primarily preservation and safety of the 9000-mile system, a larger percentage of total funding has flowed away from the urban Front Range to the rest of the state for highway maintenance.  As our budget dropped from $1.6B to $1.2B, the ability to fund new projects has almost evaporated.  And so has any meaningful ability to quickly move the PPACG MOU percentage.

Sorry to be so long winded.  If you think we can still have a beneficial meeting, I will be there.

Don

Here’s the letter that Bach and other members of the mayors caucus, including Manitou Springs Mayor Marc Snyder and El Paso County Commissioner Amy Lathen, sent to Hunt this week:

May 22, 2012

Mr. Don Hunt

Colorado Department of Transportation

4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Room 262

Denver, Colorado 80222

Dear Mr. Hunt:

The members of the Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus have reviewed the information contained in your May 14, 2012 email to Mayor Steve Bach, regarding funding percentages for the Pikes Peak region (see attached).  We are in agreement with the facts contained in the email and believe the email supports our conclusions that the Pikes Peak region has not received its fair share of funding.

The calculations in the email are based on a $935 Million budget for CDOT.  The actual CDOT budget is approximately $1.2 Billion, but CDOT assumes a reduced budget to determine MOU amounts.  We are willing to accept this methodology as long as we have access to calculations so that we can verify conclusions.

Within that $935 Million budget, the Pikes Peak Region will receive $96 Million in 2012 (10.27% of the budget).  This includes the $30 Million provided for the I-25 widening.  This exceeds our MOU agreement of 9.48% and we have no argument with the funding allocation in 2012.  Our disagreement is in our historic and possible future funding.

Over the last six years (2006 to 2011) our portion of the statewide funding (according to CDOT calculations and confirmed during an April 12th meeting with CDOT staff) has been 7.06%.  During that same time period CDOT was able to meet the DRCOG MOU funding amount.  If our six year average had been 9.48% there would have been over $135 Million in additional funding available to the Pikes Peak Region.  For that amount of funding we could have reconstructed both the Cimarron Interchange and the Fillmore Interchange on I-25, or other critically needed projects in the region, during the last six years.

The 2013 Budget (with the additions recently recommended by STAC and the Transportation Commission) demonstrates that in 2013 DRCOG will receive 39% funding while PPACG will only receive 6% of funding.  That means DRCOG will be receiving 97.5% of their anticipated amount will PPACG will only receive 63% of our agreed upon funding.

 

As the elected officials within the Pikes Peak Region, we feel it is important for CDOT to commit to funding the region at the 9.48% that was agreed upon.  This would provide an additional $22 Million every year to the region.  With our long list of needed projects, this funding is crucial.

Regards,

Steve Bach                  Blair Bartling          Bruce Brown         Travis Easton          Buck Hakes                 

Colorado Springs           Calhan                     Cripple Creek         Monument                Victor

Jeri Howells                 Jim Ignatius            Amy Lathen                                          Marc Snyder                      

Fountain                        Teller County            El Paso County                                      Manitou Springs

Dave Turley                 Lorrie Worthey

                                                       Woodland Park              Green Mountain Falls

CC:       John Hickenlooper, Governor, State of Colorado

Les Gruen, Colorado Transportation Commission Representative

 

Bach hits the road to talk transportation with Hick

March 20th, 2012, 11:26 am by

Members of a new group formed by Mayor Steve Bach met with Gov. John Hickenlooper in Denver on Monday to talk about transportation issues in the Pikes Peak region.

The discussion between the governor and the Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus focused on the level of state funding to the region and representation on the State Transportation Commission,” city spokeswoman Laura Benjamin said in a press release.

“The Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus believes this lack of funding is partially the result of our low level of representation on the Commission. They also believe a new appropriation of commissioners should be considered to better represent the second largest city and most populous county in the state,” Benjamin wrote in the press release.

Colorado Springs businessman Les Gruen, president of Urban Strategies, Inc., a real estate development and advisory services company, currently represents the region on the transportation commission. He has served on the commission since 2007.

Benjamin said the press release didn’t imply that Gruen wasn’t representing the region well but that the region should have more representation on the commission.

“That we’re not represented enough, not that he’s not doing a good job,” she said.

Gruen was a big supporter of Richard Skorman, Bach’s opponent in the mayoral race.

In addition to Bach, other members of the caucus that met with Hickenlooper in Denver were Fountain Mayor Jeri Howells, Green Mountain Falls Mayor Tyler Stephens, Manitou Springs Mayor Marc Snyder, Monument Mayor Travis Easton and El Paso County Commission Chairwoman Amy Lathen, according to Benjamin’s press release.

The governor was quoted as saying that he was supportive of the caucus.

“I believe it’s the right thing to do,” Hickenlooper said.

Even though Monday’s meeting was at 10:30 a.m., Benjamin didn’t issue a press release until 6:44 p.m.

“I overlooked it. In the hustle and bustle, it got by me,” Benjamin said Tuesday.

“I did not get it out sooner, so that rests on my shoulders if you’re looking for the person who is responsible for that,” she added.

Bach: ‘This is a new day for the Pikes Peak area’

March 5th, 2012, 1:56 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach formally announced the creation of the Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus, which includes the mayors of surrounding communities and the chairs of the El Paso and Teller county commissioners.

The group plans to meet to address, among other things, transportation issues.

“This group will be traveling to Denver in the near future. We’ve asked to meet with Gov. Hickenlooper,” Bach said.

“(It will be) the first time, I think, in history that will have happened, that all the mayors and county chairs from our region will be together … to meet with Gov. (John) Hickenlooper to ask him to provide the support we need in the Pikes Peak region for our state highways,” he said.

“I’m very excited about the prospects of what we can accomplish together.”

YouTube Preview Image

Bach and other regional leaders want to meet with Hickenlooper

February 2nd, 2012, 1:54 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach and El Paso County Commission Chair Amy Lathen

On the campaign trail, Mayor Steve Bach pledged to build regional collaboration.

On Thursday, the mayor made a big step toward achieving his promise by organizing what is being called the first Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus.

The group, which met for the first time this morning, plans to request a meeting with Gov. John Hickenlooper in the near future to talk about issues facing the Pikes Peak region.

Bach’s Communications Office announced this afternoon that Bach had met behind closed doors with other regional officials and that they planned to request a meeting with the governor.

Despite the name — Pikes Peak Region Mayors Caucus — El Paso County Commission Chair Amy Lathen an Teller County Commission Chair Jim Ignatius also attended the meeting.

“Mayor Bach decided to organize this group as a direct result of attending the Denver Metro Mayors Caucus,” the Communications Office said. “The Mayors will come together to build consensus and collaborate on regional issues.”

Thursday’s meeting, in the City Administration Building downtown, was a “get acquainted meeting.”

The new group plans to meet again next month to talk about the Colorado Department of Transportation and funding for the entire region.

“We will in turn, as a group, ask for a meeting with Governor Hickenlooper,” Bach is quoted as saying. “Our hope is that this group of Mayors and Commissioners will be able to effectively address the larger issues facing the region.”

City spokeswoman Mary Scott said she didn’t know when the group would request a meeting with the governor.

“I don’t know if that has been determined yet,” she said in an email. “I am copying (Chief Communications Officer Cindy Aubrey) to see if she can find this out for you.”

Other attendees include Calhan Mayor Blair Bartling, Cripple Creek Mayor Bruce Brown, Monument Mayor Travis Easton, Fountain Mayor Jeri Howells and Manitou Springs Mayor Marc Snyder.

Bach, who pledged transparency in his administration, didn’t make the news media aware of the meeting.

When asked why not,  Scott responded: “This was not a public meeting.”

 

Former mayoral candidate runs against Lathen for county commissioner

November 10th, 2011, 10:19 am by

Former mayoral candidate Phil McDonald is setting his sights on El Paso County.

McDonald, a small business owner and married father of three, is running for county commissioner against Amy Lathen.

“I decided to run for County Commissioner because the voters of District 2 deserve better,” McDonald said in a statement.

“They deserve a commissioner who will be truthful and respectful, who will work cooperatively with other county officials, and who will be as frugal with taxpayer money as the voters are with their personal budgets,” he said. “As a small business owner, I see first hand how government can stifle business growth. I will remove those obstacles, so we can grow jobs.”

During the crowded race for mayor, McDonald dropped out and endorsed Mayor Steve Bach.

Will Bach return the favor?

Stay tuned.

McDonald filed a candidate affidavit to run for county commissioner Nov. 8.

“I am committed to being part of the solution to the problems in El Paso County, protecting our water rights and getting government out of the way of our citizens. I love El Paso County and look forward to serving as your District 2 County Commissioner,” he said in the statement.

According to McDonald’s press release:

McDonald is a Colorado Springs native, attending Mitchell High School and Adams State College. He has previously worked in the medical field and in El Paso County law enforcement. He has been active in coaching youth sports for the Police Athletic League, the City’s Park and Recreation system, and District 11 schools. McDonald and his wife Pamela currently own and operate The Uniform Shop, providing school and team uniforms, scrubs, and hospitality wear. He has also started the brand Lightning Athletics, which has grown since its inception. The McDonalds have three boys and live in the Rustic Hills neighborhood that Phil grew up in.

 

Bach: Sales tax increase for parks ‘tantamount to surrendering’

June 16th, 2011, 1:11 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach gave supporters of a proposed ballot issue to increase sales taxes to pay for park maintenance in El Paso County a hard dose of reality Wednesday.

“I think you know this – I’m just being candid with you – I ran on a pledge not support any increase in taxes,” Bach told Nissa Steinhour, who serves on the board of the Trails and Open Space Coalition, and other park advocates.

“To me, this is tantamount to surrendering to, in my opinion, inefficient, ineffective government,” the mayor said.

But Steinhour, who appeared before city and county officials Wednesday to present the proposed ballot question and seek their support, said discussions about funding deficiencies for park maintenance have been going on for years. Government workers have been at the table and say “the efficiencies have already been found,” she told Bach.

“They’re kind of down to the bone,” Steinhour said.

Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko said she wasn’t so sure.

“I am not wholeheartedly convinced that we actually are as efficient as we could be in this one particular area and a lot of other areas,” Czelatdko said.

Although the Trails and Open Space Coalition is seeking support from the City Council and other government officials, it is lobbying county commissioners to refer the proposal to the November ballot. The proposed sales tax increase, which would sunset in 15 years, would amount to adding 15 cents to a $100 purchase.

The coalition is scheduled to meet with county commissioners Tuesday to discuss the proposal in a work session. County commissioners will take a formal vote in the future.

Commission Chairwoman Amy Lathen said she didn’t know the likelihood of the board referring the question to the ballot, though observers say the chances are slim to none.

“It really will take that public hearing and all the questions and answers and then we’ll vote,” she said.

But Lathen seemed to indicate that she wasn’t supportive, saying voters have to believe that existing resources are being managed properly before they approve a tax increase.

“If they don’t believe that, they’re not going to give more, and they shouldn’t, so we have to make a decision as to whether we think there are more efficiencies to be found,” she said.

“There were some statements made here that we’re not sure that those efficiencies have been found. I happen to agree with that,” she said.

Mayoral candidates aim to impress Pikes Peak Firearms Coalition

February 2nd, 2011, 9:06 am by

What’s next?

A gun pledge?

Colorado Springs’ next mayor will have little – if any – influence over firearms issues, but a local gun rights group is sponsoring a mayoral candidate forum Feb. 10.

The event, sponsored by the Pikes Peak Firearms Coalition, is free and open to the public. It is scheduled from 7-9 p.m. at VFW Post 4051, 430 E Pikes Peak Ave.

“As a group concerned about our rights, lawful gun owners need to be involved in the election process: as candidates, delegates, party officials, and VOTERS!!” the coalition says on its website.

Gun rights are huge in Colorado Springs, and the coalition’s endorsement is highly sought after by many candidates.

The coalition believes, among other things, that “there are people who prey upon others regardless of what laws are enacted and the possibility of being the victim of a violent criminal attack is very real.”

The group has several well-known members.

The president of the coalition is conservative radio host Jeff Crank, who issued a no-tax pledge to mayoral and City Council candidates.

The secretary of the group is Laura Carno, a producer on the Jeff Crank Radio Show and mayoral candidate Steve Bach’s campaign spokeswoman.

Colorado Springs Councilman Bernie Herpin is the group’s treasurer and webmaster. Herpin, as well as county Commissioner Amy Lathen, serve on the group’s political action committee.

Paige to Lathen: “It wasn’t my error”

September 13th, 2010, 9:42 am by

When El Paso County Commissioner Amy Lathen accused Colorado Springs Councilman Sean Paige of supporting the legalization of marijuana, it sparked some tense e-mails.

This is the e-mail that Paige wrote to Lathen after Lathen claimed in an op-ed piece that Paige supports the full legalization of marijuana:

Dear Amy:

Nowhere in my writings or statements have I said I support the complete legalization of marijuana, and you and I have never spoken on the issue, so you had no basis for making that claim in your Gazette column over the weekend. I do support respecting the rights granted medical marijuana patients under Amendment 20. I believe a dispensary ban is a roundabout way of denying those rights, and of negating Amendment 20, by limiting patient options and choking off supply. I believe the best (and the constitutional) way to move forward is regulating, monitoring and taxing medical marijuana. But I do not support full legalization — something that a modicum of research, or a quick phone call or email, would have verified. 

I know this sort of misinformation has gotten wide circulation on the dispensary ban side, where accuracy, fact and truth count for little, but you’re the first to get caught in the act. I expect a written correction and apology, in print, as soon as possible. 

Sean Paige

This is Lathen’s response to Paige:

Sean,

I don’t read blogs and heard of your upset when contacted by an Independent reporter late yesterday.  I made no negative assertions toward you and in stating that the argument of legalizing marijuana is a legitimate discussion to have, implied no ill will whatsoever.  I invite you to deal with conflicts like this by giving me a call because I will not be aware of your concerns via the Gazette blog.  I am very accessible and here to respond if ever you have any concerns and so I am glad that you sent an email.

That being said, I always seek to be factually correct in all communications and so will share a few reasons why I was under the impression that you do favor legalization.   Some examples occurred during the live debate on KoAA where some of your comments strongly led several in the audience, including myself to believe that you support legalization.  Specifically, I note these comments, “But let’s get real about it.  What’s the biggest driver of crime in this society right now?  It’s prohibition against drug use.  It’s illegal drug use…”  “The real problem is the blood bath on the Mexican border.”  “It should be done in the open.  If it’s legal, no one should interfere.”  “This is a freedom issue”… “It’s about personal freedom”… “to use it if you want to use it.”

This drug is the same drug regardless of whether one is using it for medical reasons or recreational use and you repeatedly expressed that no one should stand between an individual and that choice, specifically calling out the DEA (a legal enforcement body) and expressing in various ways that they should get off folks’ backs.

These are just some of the comments which led me to an understanding of your position.  If I misinterpreted these comments I very happily apologize.  I also find this encouraging because I am hoping that this means that you will be willing to openly join in opposition to legalized marijuana while preserving the intent and patient care under Amendment 20.

 Amy Lathen 

This is Paige’s response:

Amy:
 
Thanks for the explanation but it doesn’t help correct the record in the public forum, which is where you put out the misinformation. A short letter of correction to The Gazette, setting the record straight, would be appreciated. I don’t think I should have to be the one to do that. It wasn’t my error. 
 
Sean