City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Angela Dougan' Tag

HBA endorses only two incumbents in council races

January 15th, 2013, 6:00 pm by

The deadline for filing papers to run for City Council is still three weeks away.

But the political action committee of the Housing and Building Association of Colorado Springs has already finalized its endorsements.

“By this time, with the amount of time candidates have had to consider running, we figure that people that have that kind of passion for office already have been out there long enough to have a good sense of the field. So to us, it’s not too early,” said William Mutch, the HBA’s director of government affairs and public policy.

The endorsements were made before all the candidates are known because it’s a “longstanding tradition” of the HBA to get “involved effectively,” Mutch said.

The HBA endorsed only two incumbents — Angela Dougan and Tim Leigh.

The HBA endorsed Keith King over incumbent Brandy Williams in District 3 and Al Loma over Bernie Herpin in District 5.

The fifth incumbent — Lisa Czelatdko — is apparently not seeking re-election.

Ed Bircham, who is running for council District 6 and wasn’t endorsed by the HBA, said he didn’t receive a questionnaire or an invitation to interview with the organization.

“I don’t know why they made up their minds so fast without giving me the opportunity,” Bircham said.

Still, Bircham said he didn’t want to be “indebted” to any group. In fact, he said he’s going to fund his own campaign.

“I’m going to fund it myself so I’m not indebted to special interest groups,” he said.

The HBA PAC is headed by Ralph Braden, vice president at Nor’wood Development Group, one of Colorado Springs’ biggest real estate companies.

Braden, who is on the HBA’s executive committee, declined to comment.

Here are the HBA’s endorsements:

District 1: Incumbent Tim Leigh

District 2: Incumbent Angela Dougan

District 3: Keith King

District 4: Deborah Hendrix

District 5: Al Loma

District 6: David Moore

 

Which City Council members have smoked weed?

October 11th, 2012, 10:54 am by

City Council members inserted themselves into the statewide marijuana debate when they took up a resolution to oppose Amendment 64, which seeks to regulate pot like alcohol.

That got some people wondering: Have council members smoked pot? And if so, do they still smoke pot?

A few coughed up to trying weed.

Others said they’ve never touched it and never would.

A couple of councilmen were vague in their answers.

Here are their answers, all via email:

“In high school, I tried it with my four best friends in my home — yes mom was out of town,” Councilwoman Angela Dougan said.

“We had one joint. We all took a couple of puffs, and it was awful tasting. My thoughts were, ‘What a dumb thing and why would anyone do this?’  Never did it again,” she said.

“I have never used marijuana,” Councilman Merv Bennett said.

Bennett said the question posed to council was “very inappropriate.”

“The inappropriateness relates to asking a question that could lead to a criminal conviction.  It isn’t  a problem for me. I haven’t even smoked a cigarette,” Bennett said.

“As it relates to the debate, it is an Amendment to our State  Constitution that could have significant and serious implications to our City, the quality of life of our citizens, federal funding for roads and bridges, public safety, etc.  Something of that significance demands our attention,” Bennett added.

Like Bennett, Councilwoman Brandy Williams said she’s never smoked pot — or even a cigarette.

“I took D.A.R.E rather seriously,” she said, referring to the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program.

Councilman Val Snider took a page out of the Bill Clinton playbook.

“Does it count if you didn’t inhale?” Snider asked.

Councilman Tim Leigh was evasive in his answer.

“I saw your inquiry about council’s pot-smoking-propensity,” Leigh said in his first response.

“While I cannot state with absolute equivocation, it seems we’re all dipping in the medicine on about every other Tuesday afternoon, just after the lunch hour.  That will likely come to an abrupt and unfettered halt when the Mayor (with my full endorsement) creates a no-smoking zone in Acacia Park,” he said.

When pressed for an answer, Leigh continued to be evasive.

“Puff the Magic Dragon, lived by the sea, Frolicked in the autumn mist in a a land called Hana Leigh,” he wrote.

When asked if he was smoking pot when he came up with that response, Leigh, a fitness buff, offered this tidbit and hinted that he may be cover-boy material.

“I’m smoking, alright. I’m on the stair master at the club with Men’s Journal. Photo shoot. Something about my lung power and fitness!” he said.

Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko is out of town and did not respond.

The three council members who served on council before answered the question a few years ago.

Councilman Bernie Herpin said the only marijuana he had ever seen was on TV.

“Until I visited a dispensary, I had never actually seen marijuana in the flesh,” Herpin said.

Council President Scott Hente said he “never” smoked marijuana.

“Look where I graduated from,” said Hente, a retired lieutenant colonel who graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1975.

Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin said she tried it once and only once.

“I was so paranoid and looking over my shoulder the entire time that I decided it just wasn’t worth it and never tried it again,” she said. “That’s a very honest answer from a politician.”

By the way, Martin cast the lone dissenting vote on the resolution opposing Amendment 64.

“I wasn’t afraid of medical marijuana dispensaries, and I’m not afraid of this bill for marijuana in our community,” Martin said Tuesday.

The vote to pass the resolution was 5-1. Leigh refused to vote, saying the council isn’t in the business of making pronouncements.

Czelatdko and Williams were absent, though Williams said she would have voted with the majority.

 

Councilwoman says Utilities kept her in the dark

September 18th, 2012, 10:38 am by

Angela Dougan

The Colorado Springs Utilities Board is expected to make a decision Wednesday about the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

But at least one member of the board — City Councilwoman Angela Dougan — didn’t know anything about it.

“I was going to walk in blind tomorrow,” she said.

The Gazette is calling other members of the City Council to find out whether they were kept in the dark, too. The council doubles at the Utilities Board and oversees the $1.1 billion city-owned enterprise.

According to the revised Utilities Board agenda, the board is expected to make a decision regarding the “Drake Retirement Analysis.”

The agenda doesn’t include any supporting documentation.

The board and members of the community, including Mayor Steve Bach and his supporters, have been debating whether or not to conduct a decommissioning study on Drake this year or next.

Dougan said the agenda packet she received Friday didn’t include any decision on Drake. In fact, she said, the last agenda item was scheduled for 3:30 p.m., and according to the revised agenda, the board will consider the Drake decision at 4 p.m.

“Ours goes to 3:30 p.m.,” Dougan said, referring to the agenda she received Friday.

“Nobody has talked to me about it, so I’m very concerned about a decision being made at this point in time,” she said. “How can we make a decision when we don’t even have documentation 24 hours out?”

 

 

Date of special meeting on Drake up in the air

September 17th, 2012, 8:33 am by

Photo courtesy of Nick Kittle

City Council President Scott Hente said he will schedule a special meeting to get public input on an experimental emissions control technology at the coal-fired Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

But he said last week that it probably won’t be on Sept. 26 as requested by four of his colleagues because that’s the day of Yum Kippur, the holiest day of the year for the Jews.

“I’ve already had at least one constituent come to me and say, ‘I’d really like to come. Please don’t schedule this on my highest of holy days,’” Hente said last week.

“I wouldn’t schedule a meeting on Christmas Day,” he said.

Hente said he has to call the meeting but believes he has the “leeway” to set the date and time.

“I called Scott to confirm his plans on changing the date because I did not hear it from him, and he confirmed it with stating he only had to give 24 hours notice,” City Councilwoman Angela Dougan said today on Facebook.

“He also stated he planned on making a decision today, and I asked if he would share that decision with me so I could get it out to the interested community, and he said yes,” she added. “So, stay tuned. Date and time may change but I will do my best to insure (sic) the public knows.”

Bach criticizes news media for ‘Monday morning quarterbacking’ of Waldo Canyon fire

August 2nd, 2012, 9:10 am by

Mayor Steve Bach kicked off his town hall meeting last night by thanking his wife, Suzi. He called her his rock and best friend.

After introducing firefighters in the room, Bach criticized the news media — he pointed directly at a reporter from The Gazette — for its “Monday morning quarterbacking” of the Waldo Canyon fire.

“I know there’s a lot of Monday morning quarterbacking going on by members of the media, but I could not be more proud of our city staff,” he said.

“We evacuated 26,000 people in two hours on that Tuesday the 26th. It was chaotic. I was on the interstate and saw it,” he said. “It was not totally smooth by any means but there were no incidents and there were no injuries. That’s a tremendous testament to the people themselves who evacuated … and the pressure they were under and how fearful they must have been.”

Bach also endorsed Councilwoman Angela Dougan. The town hall meeting was held at Timberview Middle School in the northeast part of town in Dougan’s district.

“Angela Dougan has been there for me every single time in my first year in office in terms of simply fiscal responsibility and using common sense in city government,” he said.

“I could not give you a stronger endorsement of somebody than I want to do right now of Angela Dougan. I wish I could say that about all my colleagues (other City Council members) but Angela Dougan gets it,” he said.

Here’s video of the mayor’s opening remarks:

YouTube Preview Image

 

Clark says she didn’t post picture of funeral itself

August 1st, 2012, 9:43 am by

Sallie Clark

El Paso County Commissioner Sallie Clark says she didn’t post any photos on Facebook of the funeral service of fallen motorcycle officer Matt Tyner.

Rather, Clark said she posted a photo of the honor guard entering the service.

Splitting hairs?

You decide.

Here is the full, unedited text of Clark’s statement to The Gazette.

Your blog is factually incorrect.

The photo posted (following the memorial service) included a photo only of the honor guard and the flag entering the service. At no time were any photos posted of the service itself or the family members out of respect for their privacy. This must be clarified and corrected immediately. I can send you a copy, but only with Councilwoman Dougan’s permission.

My original post stated that it was a fitting ceremony for a well respected officer and that we should all keep the family and friends in our prayers.  I have always had great admiration for those in public safety and believe that our community does as well in honoring those who have served.

Councilwoman ‘upset’ after Sallie Clark posts photo of fallen police officer’s funeral on Facebook

August 1st, 2012, 8:49 am by

Sallie Clark

Would you take a picture at a funeral and post it on Facebook?

According to City Councilwoman Angela Dougan, El Paso County Commissioner Sallie Clark took a photo during the funeral of fallen Colorado Springs Policeman Matt Tyner on Tuesday and posted it on Facebook.

Dougan, the wife of a policeman, said Clark’s actions upset her beyond belief.

“It upset me because I thought that was completely inappropriate and over the line,” Dougan said Wednesday.

Dougan said she pulled Clark aside during the joint Republican-Democrat party fund raiser for the Waldo Canyon fire victims at Penrose House and expressed her feelings.

“Within a couple of hours, Sallie Clark called me and thanked me for saying that personally to her and that she had removed them from her Facebook,” Dougan said.

“I was very proud that she did that. She said she never meant any ill will or any inappropriateness.”

The picture that Clark posted on Facebook showed an honor guard from the Colorado Springs Police Department presenting the American flag to Tyner’s mother during the funeral at New Life Church.

The Gazette sent Clark an email seeking comment.

(Another) Quote of the Day

July 30th, 2012, 5:00 pm by

City Councilman Tim Leigh voted in favor of moving forward with plans to install scrubber technology at the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

Last week, Leigh flip-flopped, saying he received new information after the July 18 meeting.

Not everyone believes Leigh’s explanation.

He reversed course after Mayor Steve Bach said he hoped the council would reverse its decision.

Leigh, as well as Councilwoman Angela Dougan, are the mayor’s strongest allies on council.

Here’s what Leigh had to say about it all:

“You can say Leigh is a flip-flopper because that’s what people are saying all over the community today. You know how I roll. Put it right out there. Everybody thinks I’m a flip-flopper, and they think I’m Steve Bach’s stooge. Isn’t that what’s going on?”

 

Dougan: Decision on Drake made without all the facts

July 30th, 2012, 7:19 am by

Angela Dougan

City Councilwoman Angela Dougan says the decision to move forward with plans to install emissions control technology at the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown was made without all the facts.

“It is clear to me that the real questions have not even been asked and decisions are being made that will affect generations to come without factual, true, give me both sides, put it all on the table, data,” she wrote Monday on Facebook.

“Am I wrong here??” she asked.

Dougan listed a long list of questions that she says need to be answered before Colorado Springs Utilities can go ahead with the technology at Drake. The technology was invented by Colorado Springs-based Neumann Systems Group.

The council, acting as the Utilities Board, voted 7-2 to proceed with the technology. Dougan and Councilwoman Brandy Williams cast the dissenting votes.

“All I know is that the (Utilities Board) needs to start running utilities instead of the other way around and that will take way more than 5 hours a month and the famous tag line “I need 5 board members” to do anything I don’t already want to do. It will take the citizens demanding it,” Dougan wrote.

Dougan’s request that additional questions be answered comes on the heels of Councilman Tim Leigh saying that the decision on Drake needs to be revisited.

Leigh voted in favor of moving forward with the technology but now is backpedaling.

All this comes after Mayor Steve Bach said on the radio Friday that he hoped the council would reverse its decision on what he called “experimental” technology. Utilities isn’t under the purview of the mayor, but Bach said voters expected the mayor to weigh in on an issue as important as the city-owned utility.

Dougan and Leigh are allies of the mayor.

The big question now is: Do Dougan and Leigh have enough votes to put pause on the decision?

Here is the full, unedited text of Dougan’s statement on Facebook:

I had a busy weekend and it was wonderful but the hot topic was Utilities and what to do.. everyone seemed to have a position but as i talked to both sides it is clear to me that the real questions have not even been asked and decisions are being made that will affect generations to come without factual true, give me both sides, put it all on the table, data. Am I wrong here??
A few questions I would like answers to that I could trust…Do we need the power of Drake? If so how much do we need? How often do we need it? Have we ever looked at other power usage models within our own company? Will Neuman work in the field for more than three years? Why are they not part of the maintenance contract? If Neuman falils or needs maintenance can anyone fix or are we over a barrel with having to pay them whatever they want since they are the only guys in town? Will Neumann scrubbers be easily and economically retrofitted to take care of new EPA/legal conditions? Does the community understand we are gambling 100M of their money? What are the odds of that gamble? What is the true chance of payback? Can Drake even be moved and at what cost? Does Nixon need scrubbers now and if not when? Why does utility continuely put them selves at such debt load and finance everything for 30+ years? Why not save first or make a plan to pay off in 5 or 10 years? Why does Utiliies need five board members to tell them to knock it off with food at meetings that are not true working lunch meetings?
Okay, mayber the last one is not so vital in concern of Drake but it is important into Utilities current philosphy of what and how they balance their check book. Could we merge duplicate efforts in HR and IT? Why so much top ADM at Utility compared to the City and Private?
All I know is that the board needs to start running utilities instead of the other way around and that will take way more than 5 hours a month and the famous tag line “I need 5 board members” to do anythiing I don’t already want to do. It will take the citizens demanding it. Trust me I have tried and now I am asking for your help. We need these questions and many more answered so we can make a good trustworthy backed on fact decsion for the future of our City and its utility needs.

Bach hopes council reverses decision on Drake

July 26th, 2012, 1:49 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach said Thursday he hopes the City Council will reverse its decision to move ahead with plans to install “experimental” emissions control technology at the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

Last week, the council, acting as the Utilities Board, voted 7-2 to proceed with plans to install a pollutant-removing technology invented by Colorado Springs-based Neumann Systems Group. The technology is designed to clean sulfur dioxide from coal-burning power plants.

The council also voted to delay until 2013 a $500,000 study to look at decommissioning Drake, which was built in 1925 with two 2.5 megawatt generators.​ The plant

Councilwoman Angela Dougan and Brandy Williams voted in opposition.

“What’s the point of doing the study if they’re going to go ahead and upgrade the plant? It makes no sense,” Bach said on the Richard Randall radio show on KVOR.

Randall asked the mayor how he would respond to critics who would question why he was getting involved in matters pertaining to Colorado Springs Utilities  when the utility company is overseen by council.

Bach pointed to his involvement with Memorial Health System, which is also under the purview of council.

“I think the voters expect the mayor to weigh in on matters of general importance to the community,” he said.

“I’m trying very hard not to interfere, not to micromanage or get in the way. But I think the future of our utilities is so important that folks, I think, want the mayor to weigh in,” he said.

Bach said he sent council a letter June 5 asking council to hold up on the expansion of Martin Drake “until we can, all of us, get comfortable with what’s the right direction.”

Bach said council has yet to respond to his letter.

“Respectfully, I’m just saying that I hope city council will reverse its recent decision to move forward with that technology until we can all be comfortable with the answer,” he said.

Williams said she’s heard unofficial discussions about reopening the debate over the power plant’s future.

“I know that phone calls are being made because people in the community are a little concerned what happened last time,” Williams said.

Williams said she was concerned that council didn’t have all of the research and information on the costs of shifting the Neumann system to the Ray Nixon Power Plant before it voted, and that it voted against the recommendation of Utilities’ staff to make the switch to Nixon while Drake’s future was discussed.

“We didn’t take our own best option,” Williams said.

However, Council President Scott Hente said he hasn’t heard any talks about taking another look at Drake and that he doesn’t think doing so would be fair to Neumann Systems Group.

“When we said, ‘Continue,’ I’m sure Neumann Systems started putting more money into it,” Hente said. “I’m not sure I want to keep jerking them around.”

Hente said Bach hasn’t spoken with him about the board’s decision.

Bach said the council’s decision reflects on past practices at City Hall.

“This is (an) example of whether we want to continue to do business as usual or whether we want to transform city government to be more efficient and more effective,” he said.

“I’m not talking about anything other than I believe we do not need Martin Drake Power Plant capacity. When we hit peak load in this city, we barely get into needing Martin Drake from what I’m told by people who are experts in that business outside of Colorado Springs Utilities. Now that needs to be fact checked,” he said.

“I’m also told that we could buy peak power from other providers, far less expensively than maintaining a 50-year-old power plant and upgrading it to the tune of $250 million. Shouldn’t we look at that?”

Utilities spokeswoman Natalie Eckhart said the $250 million cost is if Utilities converts both Drake and Nixon.

“The cost for Drake is $121 million,” she said.

Eckhart also said the community relies on Drake for its electricity.

“The statement that says that we barely use it is absolutely not true,” she said.

Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin said council decided July 18 that keeping Drake open offered the lowest costs for Utilities’ ratepayers.

“I think we just can’t continue to go back and forth on these decisions,” Martin said. “I’m comfortable we made the best decision last Wednesday to move forward with Neumann and Drake.”