City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Brandy Williams' Tag

Councilwoman suffering Notyetupdatedherwebsiteitis

January 17th, 2013, 10:31 am by

Dear City Councilwoman Brandy Williams: Time to update your campaign website.

Williams, who is running for re-election against former state Sen. Keith King and former county Commissioner Jim Bensberg in the race for District 3, lists the Housing and Building Association of Colorado Springs among her endorsers.

But Williams failed to secure the HBA’s endorsement this year.

Granted, Williams includes the HBA among the organizations supporting her on her old campaign website.

But one of her competitors — King — landed in hot water this week when he listed county Commissioner Sallie Clark as a member of his advisory council.

It’s true that Clark served on King’s advisory council. But she did so when he was in the Legislature.

“Sorry for the confusion, Sallie Clark,” King’s campaign manager, Daniel Cole, said on Facebook.

“Keith’s page is currently undergoing a transition from a Legislative website to a new Council website, which has been built for a couple days, but which has lain dormant as we worked out networking issues.”

Clark, who is friends with all the candidates, asked that her name be removed.

 

HBA endorses only two incumbents in council races

January 15th, 2013, 6:00 pm by

The deadline for filing papers to run for City Council is still three weeks away.

But the political action committee of the Housing and Building Association of Colorado Springs has already finalized its endorsements.

“By this time, with the amount of time candidates have had to consider running, we figure that people that have that kind of passion for office already have been out there long enough to have a good sense of the field. So to us, it’s not too early,” said William Mutch, the HBA’s director of government affairs and public policy.

The endorsements were made before all the candidates are known because it’s a “longstanding tradition” of the HBA to get “involved effectively,” Mutch said.

The HBA endorsed only two incumbents — Angela Dougan and Tim Leigh.

The HBA endorsed Keith King over incumbent Brandy Williams in District 3 and Al Loma over Bernie Herpin in District 5.

The fifth incumbent — Lisa Czelatdko — is apparently not seeking re-election.

Ed Bircham, who is running for council District 6 and wasn’t endorsed by the HBA, said he didn’t receive a questionnaire or an invitation to interview with the organization.

“I don’t know why they made up their minds so fast without giving me the opportunity,” Bircham said.

Still, Bircham said he didn’t want to be “indebted” to any group. In fact, he said he’s going to fund his own campaign.

“I’m going to fund it myself so I’m not indebted to special interest groups,” he said.

The HBA PAC is headed by Ralph Braden, vice president at Nor’wood Development Group, one of Colorado Springs’ biggest real estate companies.

Braden, who is on the HBA’s executive committee, declined to comment.

Here are the HBA’s endorsements:

District 1: Incumbent Tim Leigh

District 2: Incumbent Angela Dougan

District 3: Keith King

District 4: Deborah Hendrix

District 5: Al Loma

District 6: David Moore

 

Former state Sen. Keith King mulls City Council run

January 4th, 2013, 2:06 pm by

Former state Sen. Keith King is considering running for City Council District 3.

“I picked up the papers, but I haven’t made a final decision,” King, 64, said Friday.

“I’ll be making a decision shortly.”

King is well known in Colorado Springs, especially in political circles.

King, who moved to Colorado Springs in 1977 and started a waterbed furniture store chain with 18 stores in six states, served on the Cheyenne Mountain School District Board. He served as a state representative for eight years and as a state senator for four.

“I would have run one more time, but the district got gerrymandered, and I didn’t want to run against Bill Cadman so I walked away,” he said.

King has started four charter schools and is currently the administrator of Colorado Springs Early Colleges.

King said he’s interested in running for council primarily to help the council transition to the strong-mayor form of government.

King said the council should focus more on things like developing policy and strategic planning and less on the operations of the city.

“I think the citizens of the city spoke and said they want a strong mayor to run the city much like a CEO or much like the governor of the state of Colorado,” he said.

“I bring a unique opportunity, I think, for Colorado Springs to step forward and really embrace the strong mayor form of government and have a way for council to collaborate and cooperate with the mayor and not be so confrontational that we don’t get good things done,” he said.

“I’m just looking to bring my legislative expertise and how the legislature functions and bring that to the operation of City Council to make it something that would be beneficial for good, effective governance of the city along with the strong-mayor concept,” he said.

If King decides to run, he would face at least two other candidates. Former county Commissioner Jim Bensberg announced his candidacy last year, and City Councilwoman Brandy Williams is expected to make a formal announcement next week.

 

 

 

 

Councilwoman hopes to inspire girls to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and math

October 12th, 2012, 10:17 am by

Brandy Williams

City Councilwoman Brandy Williams is among an impressive group of women hoping to inspire girls to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and math.

Williams, a civil engineer, will speak at the Giving Girls Roots in STEM — Science, Technology, Engineering and Math conference today at the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.

“The object of this program is to spur girls’ interest in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM), where girls are typically underrepresented and which promise the best opportunities for economic self-sufficiency when the girls pursue their degrees and enter the workforce,” according to STEM’s website.

“Last year’s participants overwhelmingly commented they want a career that requires a math or science background,” the website states.

According to ushispanics.com, other panelists include:

Mirenda Bruke, information systems technology consultant serving as manager of projects for Verizon Business, Wells Fargo, Hewlett Packard, and IBM.

Brigadier General Dana Capozzella, assistant adjutant general of the Army National Guard and commander of the Colorado National Guard. Capozzella works as a compliance officer and operations manager at Cascade Investment Group.

Silvia Jonasson, quality engineer at Colorado Springs-based Spectranetics, Inc.

Lt. Col. Jennifer Reeves, deputy commander, 50th Operations Group, 50th Space Wing, Schriever Air Force Base.

The panel will be moderated by Queen Brown, owner of Queen E. Brown & Associates Management Consultants. Brown also is an adjunct mathematics professor at the University of Phoenix

City Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin will also be at the conference.

She will present a proclamation to Rosemary Pierce, executive director of the Women’s Resource Agency for the International Day of the Girl.

Which City Council members have smoked weed?

October 11th, 2012, 10:54 am by

City Council members inserted themselves into the statewide marijuana debate when they took up a resolution to oppose Amendment 64, which seeks to regulate pot like alcohol.

That got some people wondering: Have council members smoked pot? And if so, do they still smoke pot?

A few coughed up to trying weed.

Others said they’ve never touched it and never would.

A couple of councilmen were vague in their answers.

Here are their answers, all via email:

“In high school, I tried it with my four best friends in my home — yes mom was out of town,” Councilwoman Angela Dougan said.

“We had one joint. We all took a couple of puffs, and it was awful tasting. My thoughts were, ‘What a dumb thing and why would anyone do this?’  Never did it again,” she said.

“I have never used marijuana,” Councilman Merv Bennett said.

Bennett said the question posed to council was “very inappropriate.”

“The inappropriateness relates to asking a question that could lead to a criminal conviction.  It isn’t  a problem for me. I haven’t even smoked a cigarette,” Bennett said.

“As it relates to the debate, it is an Amendment to our State  Constitution that could have significant and serious implications to our City, the quality of life of our citizens, federal funding for roads and bridges, public safety, etc.  Something of that significance demands our attention,” Bennett added.

Like Bennett, Councilwoman Brandy Williams said she’s never smoked pot — or even a cigarette.

“I took D.A.R.E rather seriously,” she said, referring to the Drug Abuse Resistance Education program.

Councilman Val Snider took a page out of the Bill Clinton playbook.

“Does it count if you didn’t inhale?” Snider asked.

Councilman Tim Leigh was evasive in his answer.

“I saw your inquiry about council’s pot-smoking-propensity,” Leigh said in his first response.

“While I cannot state with absolute equivocation, it seems we’re all dipping in the medicine on about every other Tuesday afternoon, just after the lunch hour.  That will likely come to an abrupt and unfettered halt when the Mayor (with my full endorsement) creates a no-smoking zone in Acacia Park,” he said.

When pressed for an answer, Leigh continued to be evasive.

“Puff the Magic Dragon, lived by the sea, Frolicked in the autumn mist in a a land called Hana Leigh,” he wrote.

When asked if he was smoking pot when he came up with that response, Leigh, a fitness buff, offered this tidbit and hinted that he may be cover-boy material.

“I’m smoking, alright. I’m on the stair master at the club with Men’s Journal. Photo shoot. Something about my lung power and fitness!” he said.

Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko is out of town and did not respond.

The three council members who served on council before answered the question a few years ago.

Councilman Bernie Herpin said the only marijuana he had ever seen was on TV.

“Until I visited a dispensary, I had never actually seen marijuana in the flesh,” Herpin said.

Council President Scott Hente said he “never” smoked marijuana.

“Look where I graduated from,” said Hente, a retired lieutenant colonel who graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1975.

Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin said she tried it once and only once.

“I was so paranoid and looking over my shoulder the entire time that I decided it just wasn’t worth it and never tried it again,” she said. “That’s a very honest answer from a politician.”

By the way, Martin cast the lone dissenting vote on the resolution opposing Amendment 64.

“I wasn’t afraid of medical marijuana dispensaries, and I’m not afraid of this bill for marijuana in our community,” Martin said Tuesday.

The vote to pass the resolution was 5-1. Leigh refused to vote, saying the council isn’t in the business of making pronouncements.

Czelatdko and Williams were absent, though Williams said she would have voted with the majority.

 

Dougan: Decision on Drake made without all the facts

July 30th, 2012, 7:19 am by

Angela Dougan

City Councilwoman Angela Dougan says the decision to move forward with plans to install emissions control technology at the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown was made without all the facts.

“It is clear to me that the real questions have not even been asked and decisions are being made that will affect generations to come without factual, true, give me both sides, put it all on the table, data,” she wrote Monday on Facebook.

“Am I wrong here??” she asked.

Dougan listed a long list of questions that she says need to be answered before Colorado Springs Utilities can go ahead with the technology at Drake. The technology was invented by Colorado Springs-based Neumann Systems Group.

The council, acting as the Utilities Board, voted 7-2 to proceed with the technology. Dougan and Councilwoman Brandy Williams cast the dissenting votes.

“All I know is that the (Utilities Board) needs to start running utilities instead of the other way around and that will take way more than 5 hours a month and the famous tag line “I need 5 board members” to do anything I don’t already want to do. It will take the citizens demanding it,” Dougan wrote.

Dougan’s request that additional questions be answered comes on the heels of Councilman Tim Leigh saying that the decision on Drake needs to be revisited.

Leigh voted in favor of moving forward with the technology but now is backpedaling.

All this comes after Mayor Steve Bach said on the radio Friday that he hoped the council would reverse its decision on what he called “experimental” technology. Utilities isn’t under the purview of the mayor, but Bach said voters expected the mayor to weigh in on an issue as important as the city-owned utility.

Dougan and Leigh are allies of the mayor.

The big question now is: Do Dougan and Leigh have enough votes to put pause on the decision?

Here is the full, unedited text of Dougan’s statement on Facebook:

I had a busy weekend and it was wonderful but the hot topic was Utilities and what to do.. everyone seemed to have a position but as i talked to both sides it is clear to me that the real questions have not even been asked and decisions are being made that will affect generations to come without factual true, give me both sides, put it all on the table, data. Am I wrong here??
A few questions I would like answers to that I could trust…Do we need the power of Drake? If so how much do we need? How often do we need it? Have we ever looked at other power usage models within our own company? Will Neuman work in the field for more than three years? Why are they not part of the maintenance contract? If Neuman falils or needs maintenance can anyone fix or are we over a barrel with having to pay them whatever they want since they are the only guys in town? Will Neumann scrubbers be easily and economically retrofitted to take care of new EPA/legal conditions? Does the community understand we are gambling 100M of their money? What are the odds of that gamble? What is the true chance of payback? Can Drake even be moved and at what cost? Does Nixon need scrubbers now and if not when? Why does utility continuely put them selves at such debt load and finance everything for 30+ years? Why not save first or make a plan to pay off in 5 or 10 years? Why does Utiliies need five board members to tell them to knock it off with food at meetings that are not true working lunch meetings?
Okay, mayber the last one is not so vital in concern of Drake but it is important into Utilities current philosphy of what and how they balance their check book. Could we merge duplicate efforts in HR and IT? Why so much top ADM at Utility compared to the City and Private?
All I know is that the board needs to start running utilities instead of the other way around and that will take way more than 5 hours a month and the famous tag line “I need 5 board members” to do anythiing I don’t already want to do. It will take the citizens demanding it. Trust me I have tried and now I am asking for your help. We need these questions and many more answered so we can make a good trustworthy backed on fact decsion for the future of our City and its utility needs.

Bach hopes council reverses decision on Drake

July 26th, 2012, 1:49 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach said Thursday he hopes the City Council will reverse its decision to move ahead with plans to install “experimental” emissions control technology at the Martin Drake Power Plant downtown.

Last week, the council, acting as the Utilities Board, voted 7-2 to proceed with plans to install a pollutant-removing technology invented by Colorado Springs-based Neumann Systems Group. The technology is designed to clean sulfur dioxide from coal-burning power plants.

The council also voted to delay until 2013 a $500,000 study to look at decommissioning Drake, which was built in 1925 with two 2.5 megawatt generators.​ The plant

Councilwoman Angela Dougan and Brandy Williams voted in opposition.

“What’s the point of doing the study if they’re going to go ahead and upgrade the plant? It makes no sense,” Bach said on the Richard Randall radio show on KVOR.

Randall asked the mayor how he would respond to critics who would question why he was getting involved in matters pertaining to Colorado Springs Utilities  when the utility company is overseen by council.

Bach pointed to his involvement with Memorial Health System, which is also under the purview of council.

“I think the voters expect the mayor to weigh in on matters of general importance to the community,” he said.

“I’m trying very hard not to interfere, not to micromanage or get in the way. But I think the future of our utilities is so important that folks, I think, want the mayor to weigh in,” he said.

Bach said he sent council a letter June 5 asking council to hold up on the expansion of Martin Drake “until we can, all of us, get comfortable with what’s the right direction.”

Bach said council has yet to respond to his letter.

“Respectfully, I’m just saying that I hope city council will reverse its recent decision to move forward with that technology until we can all be comfortable with the answer,” he said.

Williams said she’s heard unofficial discussions about reopening the debate over the power plant’s future.

“I know that phone calls are being made because people in the community are a little concerned what happened last time,” Williams said.

Williams said she was concerned that council didn’t have all of the research and information on the costs of shifting the Neumann system to the Ray Nixon Power Plant before it voted, and that it voted against the recommendation of Utilities’ staff to make the switch to Nixon while Drake’s future was discussed.

“We didn’t take our own best option,” Williams said.

However, Council President Scott Hente said he hasn’t heard any talks about taking another look at Drake and that he doesn’t think doing so would be fair to Neumann Systems Group.

“When we said, ‘Continue,’ I’m sure Neumann Systems started putting more money into it,” Hente said. “I’m not sure I want to keep jerking them around.”

Hente said Bach hasn’t spoken with him about the board’s decision.

Bach said the council’s decision reflects on past practices at City Hall.

“This is (an) example of whether we want to continue to do business as usual or whether we want to transform city government to be more efficient and more effective,” he said.

“I’m not talking about anything other than I believe we do not need Martin Drake Power Plant capacity. When we hit peak load in this city, we barely get into needing Martin Drake from what I’m told by people who are experts in that business outside of Colorado Springs Utilities. Now that needs to be fact checked,” he said.

“I’m also told that we could buy peak power from other providers, far less expensively than maintaining a 50-year-old power plant and upgrading it to the tune of $250 million. Shouldn’t we look at that?”

Utilities spokeswoman Natalie Eckhart said the $250 million cost is if Utilities converts both Drake and Nixon.

“The cost for Drake is $121 million,” she said.

Eckhart also said the community relies on Drake for its electricity.

“The statement that says that we barely use it is absolutely not true,” she said.

Council President Pro Tem Jan Martin said council decided July 18 that keeping Drake open offered the lowest costs for Utilities’ ratepayers.

“I think we just can’t continue to go back and forth on these decisions,” Martin said. “I’m comfortable we made the best decision last Wednesday to move forward with Neumann and Drake.”

 

Czelatdko points finger at city attorney over McMillion

July 26th, 2012, 9:56 am by

An editorial that resurrected the $1.15 million separation agreement with former Memorial Health System CEO Larry McEvoy led City Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko to divulge new details about what happened behind closed doors.

On a Facebook post of Gazette editorial page editor Wayne Laugesen, Czelatdko revealed discussions in closed executive session.

Here is what Czelatdko wrote, with edits:

I was actually in the closed executive session Wayne Laugesen and so know exactly what was said and not said. What was not said was a 1.2 million dollar severance package was being given to (former Memorial Health System CEO Larry) McEvoy.

What was said was:

1) Why is McEvoy here in chambers announcing a resignation with no announcement of it on the agenda or notification to Council from the City Attorney’s Office?

2) What was said from the Memorial Hospital Board Chair Jim Moore, was that they (board and Chris) were working on a severance package for McEvoy up to 18 months and that they had been working on possible packages for two weeks under the direction of Chris Melcher

3) What was said was that no Memorial contract would be valid without the signature of Jim Moore and Chris Melcher

4) And lastly, what was said was the reminder that Council, the City Attorney’s Office and Memorial board could not enter into any contracts over 1 million dollars without all three parties acknowledging it. This understanding was put in place a month prior to protect the lease negotiations and keep the current admin entering into big money contracts that UCHealth might not want.

When I left that room I know myself and many of my colleagues who did not support retention packages thought, ‘Good luck getting us to agree to anything more than his agreed contract package,’ and we went home after a 7-hour meeting day.

Wayne, please, please stop perpetuating incorrect information and writing articles based on non factual assumptions. Did (council President Scott Hente) and (council President Pro Tem Jan Martin) know more specifics? I don’t know. Do you know for a fact? Did (Councilman Merv Bennett) and (Councilwoman Brandy Williams) know? I’m not sure. Do you? All I know is Council was told by Jim Moore that Chris Melcher, City Attorney was assisting in package negotiations. Chris did not refute that as he stood there listening to Jim speak. Chris confirmed to Council what I mentioned above regarding signatures needed for agreed contract limits and Council was told a package would come back for confirmation. No confusion for me when I walked out of the room that the city attorney who is suppose to serve both Council and the Mayor, who dare Council question or challenge his legal opinion, had it under control and was working on it with the board. Assumingly looking out for the best interest of council and the city.

I also know after the nightmare began, Chris Melcher, city attorney informed council that he paid for an outside legal consult who confirmed the board could do what they did, that if we challenged them through litigation which (Councilwoman) Angela Dougan, (Councilman Tim Leigh) and myself all said we’d support, the City would be responsible for paying all their attorneys, fees, etc and they probably would win costing the taxpayers millions more of wasted dollars. Chris told Council it was a weak case to challenge, a done deal, basically Council would have to take the lumps, and the lame press release was put out by my colleagues (I was flying with space command) that we would not pursue the matter further. So as I see it everyone won but Council and the health payers.

Memorial and UCHealth got rid of McEvoy who was tainting the campaign and poisoning the morale of hospital employees, the Board showed defiance and wielded their authority one last time, McEvoy lost a job but got a heck of a lot of money, and Council gets the blame for not overseeing the Board more thoroughly. A board who legally was given full authority and fiduciary responsibility years prior. I can only assume that decision was because the prior council thought it made sense to appoint a full time board of knowledgeable people who could dedicate their time to the health system and report back monthly to council. Council, who back then, was a part time, poorly compensated body in charge of the city, the health system and the utility company. Council, who now is even more limited and minionized by certain vocal, agenda driven, influential people, who so obviously serve one master. All I can say is I hope someone is keeping track of some of these personnel issues and making permanent notes in personnel files.

Quote of the Day

July 13th, 2012, 11:28 am by

In case you’ve been living under a rock, Councilwoman Brandy Williams is an engineer.

During City Council and other meetings, Williams frequently reminds the public that she’s an engineer.

In fact, it’s turned into a joke.

During a recent Utilities Board meeting, Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko, trying hard not to laugh out loud, motioned to Councilman Tim Leigh to keep quiet when Williams mentioned once again that she is an engineer.

Yours truly also sends out a tweet on Twitter every time Williams says she’s an engineer instructing his tweeps — jokingly, of course — to take a shot.

Councilman Bernie Herpin couldn’t resist playing along during an interview Thursday.

“While I’m not a professional engineer, I am an engineer by degree so it helps me understand what I need to do,” he said, jokingly.

McMillion, FREX and Live it Up! on council agenda

May 21st, 2012, 9:53 am by

After canceling the last two regularly scheduled meetings, the City Council is back in full swing this week.

Among the items on Monday’s agenda:

Doug Price, president and CEO of the Colorado Springs Convention and Visitors Bureau, will present an update on the city’s branding strategy. That’s right, Colorado Springs, we’re still Living it Up!

The new human resources director, Mike Sullivan, will go over proposed changes to the Civilian and Sworn Personnel Policies and Procedures Manuals.

They include reducing workers’ compensation benefits for police and firefighters from 2,080 hours of injury leave at 100 percent to 1,220 hours at 85 percent. For civilian employees, the proposed change would reduce workers’ compensation benefits from 2,080 hours of injury leave at 100 percent to 960 hours at 85 percent.

The Transit Services Division will sum up the public comments that it received on a proposal to discontinue local funding for the FrontRange Express, or FREX, and raise the Metro Mobility ADA Paratransit fare from $3.00 to $3.50.

The Oil and Gas Committee, which included Councilman Val Snider, the chairman, and Councilwomen Angela Dougan and Brandy Williams, will bring the rest of council up to speed on its work. The committee was formed to provide recommendations to council for oil and gas exploration and operations.

Finally, the council plans to meet behind closed doors to discuss the $1.15 million separation agreement for former Memorial Health System CEO Dr. Larry McEvoy. According to the agenda, the council will receive “advice and negotiation consultation with the City Attorney regarding Memorial Health System” and “advice and consultation with the City Attorney regarding potential litigation matters that are subject to negotiations, developing strategy for negotiations and instructing negotiators.