Gazette
City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Councilman Sean Paige' Tag

AFP launches no-PERA pledge for politicians

May 16th, 2012, 1:34 pm by

Jeff Crank

The Colorado chapter of Americans for Prosperity asked mayoral and City Council candidates in Colorado Springs last year to sign a no-tax pledge.

Now AFP wants political candidates — as well as elected officials — to sign a pledge to opt out of the Colorado Public Employees’ Retirement Association.

“The pledge not only asks signers to abstain from participating in such programs themselves, but it commits them to taking every action possible to protect taxpayers from future pension bailouts, by restoring such funds to financial sustainability and refraining from promising public employees pension benefits that aren’t fully funded and sustainable over the long run,” Jeff Crank and Sean Paige, the Colorado chapter’s director and deputy director, respectively, said in a press release.

Here’s the press release in its entirety:

AFP PERA Pledge Aimed at Defusing Pension Time Bomb

Signatures Sought From Elected Officials and Candidates

In recognition of the fact that underfunded, fiscally-unsustainable public employ retirement programs are driving all levels government toward bankruptcy, Americans for Prosperity-Colorado today unveiled a new pledge it is asking elected officials and candidates for office to sign. The pledge not only asks signers to abstain from participating in such programs themselves, but it commits them to taking every action possible to protect taxpayers from future pension bailouts, by restoring such funds to financial sustainability and refraining from promising public employees pension benefits that aren’t fully funded and sustainable over the long run.

The pledge reads as follows:

“I, _______________________________, pledge to the taxpayers of _________________________ that, if elected, I will opt out of the Public Employees’ Retirement Association’s Defined Benefit Plan, or the applicable taxpayer-funded plan that’s available if my office is not eligible for PERA. I further pledge that I will do everything possible as an elected official to make PERA and other public-sector pension programs fiscally sustainable and self-funded, and to safeguard taxpayers against the risk of future liabilities and bailouts by moving such plans from the defined-benefit to a defined-contribution model.  I also pledge to decline invitations to make pay, pension or benefit promises to public employees that aren’t fiscally sustainable and self-supporting.”

AFP will ask elected officials with pension fund responsibility, and all candidates running in relevant races, to sign the pledge.

“Anyone paying attention knows that underfunded government employee pension plans are a major source of financial strain at virtually all levels of government,” said AFP-Colorado Director Jeff Crank, ”and we’re calling on elected officials and candidates to personally help stop the hemorrhaging, and to help prevent future bailouts, by signing this pledge. It not only commits them to not contributing further to the problem, by declining to participate in a pension option that isn’t of the defined-contribution type, but it asks that they take active steps, whenever possible, to stop promising public employees what the taxpayers can’t deliver and to start putting troubled funds back on firm financial ground.”

Crank said he thought it was important that elected officials lead by example on pension reform, which is why the group is asking politicians eligible to enroll in such pension program to decline to do so, unless they are signing up for a defined-contribution plan, or 401K-type plan, modeled after private sector plans. “One obstacle to getting these retirement plans back on track is that many elected officials are beneficiaries of the same plans we’re asking them to overhaul,” said Crank. “That creates a potential conflict of interest that we can help eliminate by asking elected officials to lead by example and not enroll in plans that aren’t sustainable and will contribute to the pension crisis.”

Although AFP is a non-partisan organization that doesn’t endorse individual candidates or political parties, it reserves the right to publicize who signs or doesn’t sign the pledge as part of its citizen education efforts.

Paige: McEvoy could ‘defuse’ the situation

May 3rd, 2012, 10:05 am by

Video from the Americans for Prosperity rally:

YouTube Preview Image

Quote of the Day

December 28th, 2011, 4:46 pm by

Former City Councilman Sean Paige, who championed a public-private partnership between the city and the owners of a swim school to keep some city pools open, said he was disappointed to hear that the agreement had been terminated.

The Colorado Springs Recreation Center will close Friday.

Paige said the city should diagnose what went wrong and learn from the experience.

“I thought we had a lot of momentum on partnerships going and I’ve seen some of that fall away as the perception has taken hold that the city has money to spare,” he said.

“I personally believe that this is a model that we need to keep pushing forward and we need to reenergize because the city’s fiscal problems, I think, are going to be chronic.”

Quote of the Day

December 15th, 2011, 3:11 pm by

“This was really just an exercise in peeing on fire hydrants – of some on council trying to mark their territory by defending frivolous spending items.”

– Sean Paige, a former city councilman and deputy director of the Colorado chapter of Americans for Prosperity, expressing his disappointment in the City Council overriding five of seven Mayor Steve Bach’s vetoes.

Before the council overrides, AFP urged the council not to override any of Bach’s line item vetoes in the 2012 budget.

“AFP is watching the veto fight closely,” Paige said earlier.

“We believe the mayor’s actions are fiscally responsible and reasonable, and the votes will be counted when we do a voter guide and candidate rating,” he said.

AFP dives into budget battle

December 15th, 2011, 12:23 pm by

The Colorado chapter of Americans for Prosperity is urging the City Council not to override any of Mayor Steve Bach’s line item vetoes in the 2012 budget.

“AFP is watching the veto fight closely,” Sean Paige, a former city councilman who is now AFP’s deputy state director, said in an email.

“We believe the mayor’s actions are fiscally responsible and reasonable, and the votes will be counted when we do a voter guide and candidate rating,” he said.

Paige fired off an email to council members about 11:10 a.m., less than two hours after council will hold a special meeting to determine whether or not to override any of Bach’s six vetoes.

Here is the full text of Paige’s email to council members:

Dear Council Members:

Just a quick note to express AFP-CO’s strong support for Mayor Bach’s line-item vetoes. We believe they’re reasonable, well-explained and fiscally responsible, given the continuing budget challenges facing the city. This isn’t the time for gamesmanship, territoriality or muscle-flexing, but for common sense, fiscal discipline and shared sacrifice. Going to battle with the mayor over tennis courts and a personal press secretary and legislative aide for City Council won’t go over well with the people who pay the bills, at a time of high economic anxiety and low public tolerance for political pettiness and posturing.

The Mayor has shown a willingness to compromise on some budget differences, but is holding firm on the right issues, as far as we can see. We urge you to compromise as well.

Since time is short and you’ll be meeting on this later today, I’ll spare you a detailed explanation for why we support these vetoes. Suffice it to say that they just make good sense at a time of such economic and fiscal uncertainty. These are potentially-pivotal decisions, which will send a clear signal to residents, and to voters, of what sort of stewards of public resources you are. We just wanted to share our views on the issue and let you know it’s something we’re paying attention to.

Thanks for your service to the city. And please drop me a line if you have questions, comments, etc.

Sincerely,

Sean Paige

Deputy State Director

Americans for Prosperity Colorado

AFP says three Memorial task force members should recuse themselves

November 8th, 2011, 3:07 pm by

Jeff Crank

The Colorado chapter of Americans for Prosperity says three members of the Memorial Health System task force have “apparent conflicts of interest” and should recuse themselves from reviewing proposals to lease Memorial.

“We believe these individuals should be asked by (City Council President Pro Tem Jan) Martin to sit-out this part of the process if they decline to do so voluntarily,” former City Councilman Sean Paige, who is AFP’s state deputy director, wrote today in an email to Mayor Steve Bach and council members.

In his email, Paige sent city officials a letter from Jeff Crank, AFP’s state director.

Paige said letter from Crank and AFP Colorado expressed “concerns about the failure/refusal of certain Memorial Task Force members to recuse themselves from this final phase of the RFP process, even though their close ties to the enterprise naturally raise doubts about their objectivity and fairness in weighing various partnership proposals.”

Here’s the full text of Crank’s letter:

Nov. 9, 2011

Dear Chairwoman Martin:

In just a matter of weeks the Memorial Health System task force will be making potentially-momentous decisions about the enterprise’s future, weighing proposals for possible leasing arrangements, yet a number of task force members – members appointed and approved without the benefit of a public or proper vetting — have apparent conflicts of interest that should bar them from participating in this phase of deliberations. The appropriate thing for these individuals to do is to recuse themselves, recognizing that their connections to Memorial raise doubts about their objectivity and fairness. But since they don’t seem inclined to do this voluntarily, we believe it falls to you, as chairwoman, to request that they do so. A failure to act now could raise serious questions about the integrity of this already-flawed process.

The individuals with the appearance of a conflict are Dr. David Corry, a surgeon at Memorial (who already has publicly voiced support for one plan under consideration), Memorial nurse Carol Flynn and Dr. Michael Welch, the director of medicine at Peak Vista Medical Health Centers, an organization with such close ties to Memorial that this may impact his ability to objectively weigh partnership proposals. Memorial not only employs two of these people; it is submitting a proposal on which they’ll be passing judgment. When the time came for task force members to declare potential conflicts, the three did not speak up, though their potential conflicts are arguably greater than those of individuals who did make declarations or — in the case of Mr. Sweet — stepped aside for the good of the process. Their failure to recognize the potential problems this creates raises even deeper doubts about their suitability to take part in this decision. If they won’t correct the situation, the chairwoman must.

While it may have been beneficial to have people serving on the Task Force with medical experience, we believe it was a mistake to appoint members with such direct ties to Memorial. That error in judgment can’t be undone now, unfortunately, but there’s still time to correct it before their involvement taints the integrity of the process. We urge an expeditious resolution to this situation. Given the already-tight timelines involved, there’s no time for delay.

Sincerely,

 

Jeff Crank

State Director

Americans for Prosperity Colorado

AFP urges City Council to hold the line on expenditures

October 21st, 2011, 5:49 pm by

Former Colorado Springs City Councilman Sean Paige, who is the deputy director of the Colorado chapter of Americans for Prosperity, just emailed Mayor Steve Bach and the City Council the following letter:

Dear Mayor and City Council:

As the city of Colorado Springs begins debating its fiscal 2012 budget priorities, let’s take a moment to consider our circumstances. The national and regional economies remain in the doldrums. Unemployment rates and economic anxiety run high. Some experts are predicting a double dip recession. Possible cuts in defense spending cast additional shadows over the local economy. And Americans have made it clear that they are taxed to the max and expect government to share in the sacrifice by continuing to tighten its belt.

Given these circumstances, we believe Mayor Bach’s 2012 budget puts the city on the sensible, responsible, fiscally-sustainable path that these uncertain times demand.  It keeps faith with the taxpayers by asking government to keep sharing in the sacrifice. It is cautious about future revenue projections, in recognition of economic uncertainties. It continues to rebuild the city’s reserve fund, which is something we may be grateful for on some future rainy day. And it doesn’t attempt to grow city bureaucracy. It’s a “conservative” budget in the best sense of the word: one designed to conserve core services, while holding the line on new spending or budget add-backs that may not be sustainable over time. It’s an austere budget for austere times. And we urge City Council to adopt the same restrained approach.

We applaud the mayor’s interest in conducting a review of the city’s pay and pension practices. With employee compensation consuming an ever larger slice of the budget pie, leaving little available for other priorities, it’s essential that these items be scrutinized. Recent news reports about “golden parachutes” being handed outgoing or retiring employees suggest that a scrub of the city’s personnel practices is needed. Escalating health care costs and pension payouts, if not brought under control, threaten the city’s financial stability. It’s neither onerous nor unfair to ask city employees to pay more into city health care and pension programs.

We urge City Council to join with the Mayor in undertaking a meaningful review and reform of the city’s pension programs. We can no longer afford to bury our heads in the sand on this issue. The sooner the necessary fixes are made, the less painful those fixes will be.  Words like “additional funding” and “new money” are just illusions when the city’s unfunded future liabilities are unidentified and unaddressed.

Finally, we agree with the Mayor that additional savings and efficiencies can be gained through a continual effort to optimize, innovate and partner with non-government entities. No areas of the city, including the police and fire departments, should be exempt from the obligation to optimize and evolve – to find creative ways to do more with less. We encourage the Mayor and City Council to create a culture inside city government that rewards and incentivizes productivity, economy, creativity, collaboration and customer service.  Establishing an office of Innovation and Sustainability is a good first step in that direction, but without concrete action those are just trendy catchphrases.

We urge City Council to hold the line on total expenditures, as the mayor proposes, and err on the side of caution in revenue projections. Spending adjustments can be made later in the fiscal year if projections exceed expectations. Hastily or haphazardly restoring services that aren’t sustainable takes citizens on a rollercoaster ride, with services expanding or contracting erratically, depending on revenue fluctuations.  Only services that can be funded over a multi-year period, and can survive a sudden decrease in revenue, should be considered for new or restored funding.

While we all hope for a dramatically improved economic and fiscal picture, it’s only prudent to be cautious given the uncertainties already described. Spending every dollar that comes in the door, and pumping-up revenue forecasts in a way that also pumps-up city spending, is the easy thing to do politically. But it’s not the fiscally responsible thing to do under the circumstances. Erring on the side of caution is much more responsible. These are the same steps average citizens are taking in response to the economic crisis.

Thank you, Mayor Bach and City Council, for all that you for the city.  We know the task of setting budget priorities is especially tough in these fiscally-challenging times.  We simply ask, as you go about this work, that you keep foremost in mind not the squeaky wheels who show up at City Hall, pleading for more funding or special treatment, but the silent majority of average citizens who rarely if ever show up at City Hall, asking for anything, but who expect the city to share in the sacrifices that these difficult times impose.

Best of luck with your budget deliberations. AFP-Colorado and our thousands of local activists will be watching with interest as you begin to make these difficult choices.

Sincerely,

 

Sean Paige

Deputy State Director, Americans for Prosperity Colorado

Paige: Memorial employees should also take a ‘Pledge of Integrity’

September 15th, 2011, 2:56 pm by

If employees at Memorial Health System want Mayor Steve Bach and other members of a Memorial task force to take a “Pledge of Integrity,” they should taken one, too.

So says former Colorado Springs City Councilman Sean Paige, who today drafted a “Memorial Health System Pledge of Integrity” in response to the “Pledge of Integrity” that Memorial penned.

“Since one side in this debate has begun questioning motives, and also have become the sudden champions of total tranparency, I have my own ‘pledge of integrity’ I would like to see signed by Memorial senior staff and employees,” Paige wrote in the City Desk blog.

Here’s the Pledge of Integrity that Paige is proposing:

Memorial Health System Employee Pledge of Integrity

I ______________ , recognizing that I am a public employee who works for the citizen-owners of Memorial Health System, and who also therefore has a direct stake in the outcome of this debate, willfully and voluntarily agree to the following statements in an effort to build trust and transparency with the community.

I hereby acknowledge that any decision about the future ownership of Memorial rests primarily with the citizens of Colorado Springs, who own this asset, not with the employees of Memorial, with senior Memorial staff, with Memorial board members or with non-employees who want to see it turned-over to insider control. I also understand that this is a political decision, resting with voters, on which senior hospital staff should remain strictly neutral and on which hospital time, resources or equipment should never be used.

I also acknowledge, as a Memorial employee or a contract physician, or a spouse or relation to the forementioned, that I’m an interested party to this debate who can’t possibly be objective about the outcome and whose motives should be viewed accordingly.

I also verify that I have never for one moment given thought to how this decision might impact me, by career path, my salary, my standing with superiors, etc., but that the only thought that ever entered by mind is of what’s good for Memorial Health System and the very lucky patients we serve.

As someone who believes strongly in total transparency, I voluntarily agree to uphold the basic tenets of the Colorado Sunshine Laws by immediately disclosing to the media, without the need for a CORA request, all internal communications I’ve had and seen pertaining to this issue, or communications I may have had with outside entities likely to be involved in a Memorial-related ballot question. I understand that lobbying on enterprise time, using enterprise resources, is inappropriate. I also will voluntarily make public any and all communications I’ve had with city council members, Memorial commission members, Memorial board members or campaign-related actors or entities on this issue.

Also, in the interest of maximum transparency, I agree to immediately disclose any information I may have, or evidence I’ve seen, that could raise doubts about the fitness of the current board and management team at Memorial to be trusted with running a stand-alone, self-supporting entity completely free from independent oversight or outside control. I also hereby attest that I’ve seen a detailed and credible plan of how Memorial will become the “Mayo Clinic of Southern Colorado” and that I have total confidence not just in the plan, but in the ability of current enterprise leadership to execute it flawlessly.

I acknowledge that neither I nor my family or those close to me could incur a financial or any other gain, personally or professionally, as a result of the outcome of this process.

Signed,

____________________      Date____________

Print____________________________________

Former councilman says Memorial RFP process ‘remains a charade’

September 2nd, 2011, 10:19 am by

Former Colorado Springs City Councilman Sean Paige says the City Council‘s recent decision to explore other options for Memorial Health System is a step in the right direction.

But the process “remains a mess,” Paige wrote today in his Page by Paige blog.

“How honest is an RFP process that is only considering lease proposals, but not possible acquisitions? How can the public intelligently weigh the pros and cons of all the options unless all the options are presented?” Paige asks.

“How will Dr. (Larry) McEvoy‘s risky game of chicken with PERA over pension liabilities impact the process? Will potential partners be deterred when the PERA liability is unsettled and a potential lawsuit looms?”

Paige says the participation of Mayor Steve Bach and other businessmen in the Memorial task force is “the only hope we have” that the process will be conducted fairly.

But Paige is still leery of the outcome.

“City Council dominance over this phase of the process guarantees not just that it will be another mess, but that it will be designed to favor one plan,” he wrote.

“We’ve all heard about something called bid-rigging. The parameters of the process can be tailored to favor one outcome. And here we have an example of attempted bid-rigging in action.”

Paige: Red-light cameras encroach on privacy, civil rights

June 28th, 2011, 10:05 am by

Former City Councilman Sean Paige, who opposed red-light cameras when he was on City Council, says Colorado Springs is going down a slippery slope with what he calls “Robocop technologies.”

“I hope we end it now, before it grows into something abusive,” Paige, a former editorial page editor at The Gazette, wrote in his blog in reaction to today’s story about increased revenue projections from red-light cameras and photo radar.

Automated ticket-writing technologies can be sold “with the seductive promise of improving ‘public safety,’ two magical words that seem to make many American eager to surrender their civil liberties,” Paige wrote.

“We can refill depleted government coffers, all while convincing some people that we’re moving them toward a risk-free world,” he wrote. “It’s a win-win — as long as we ignore the longer-term harm such programs can do our civil liberties.”

Click here to read Paige’s blog.

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline