City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Downtown' Tag

Quote of the Day

December 18th, 2012, 9:53 pm by

“So many of the complaints of solicitation in the main downtown area really were and are covered under the current and recently updated City Code on aggressive solicitation. I’ve said all year that increased police presence and enforcement, and especially a commitment to report from business owners and citizens, is what has been needed all along to improve this downtown commerce area without affecting the vitality that comes from people being on the streets or (exposing the city to) a lawsuit.”

– City Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko, reacting to news that a judge had granted the ACLU’s request for an injunction of the recently approved no-panhandling zone downtown.

Downtown parking meters will have longer times

October 16th, 2012, 1:47 pm by

Parking downtown is about to get a little friendlier.

The city says 95 percent of the parking meters in the downtown core will be extended to two hours by the close of business Tuesday.

The longer times will be on more than 100 meters between Cascade and Nevada avenues and from Colorado Boulevard to Boulder Street, according to the city’s Communications Office.

“This change will make parking more convenient and will allow citizens extra time to spend dining and shopping in beautiful downtown Colorado Springs,” Mayor Steve Bach said in a statement.

The remaining 5 percent of the parking meters in the downtown core “will remain under two hours due to special requests from banks, convenience stores and the Post Office, (which) have asked for shorter meter times to encourage and facilitate customer turnover in their businesses,” the city said.

During the Downtown Partnership’s annual Mayor’s Breakfast last week, Bach said he wanted meters with longer times.

“I get a lot of calls about our parking meter time not being long enough,” he told the audience last week.

“People want to come downtown for lunch and there’s not enough time on the meter.”

 

Quote of the Day

October 10th, 2012, 3:10 pm by

Mayor Steve Bach was the keynote speaker at the Downtown Partnership’s 15 annual Mayor’s Breakfast.

The event was standing-room-only and filled up the big ballroom at The Mining Exchange hotel downtown with 213 guests. About 30 people were turned away.

When Bach delivered his speech, he drew applause at least three times.

He also got a few chuckles.

“Panhandling is typically not done by homeless people, I’m told by our police department. They’re professionals. They get more money than I do, which I’ve been thinking about it.”

As mayor, Bach is paid about $96,000 a year.

 

Bach wants you to take a walk — an arts walk, that is

September 18th, 2012, 1:10 pm by

Click to enlarge

Mayor Steve Bach will lead the fourth and final Arts Walk of 2012 through downtown Colorado Springs on Wednesday.

“A vibrant arts and cultural city will drive Colorado Springs to be a successful city where people love to live, work and vacation,” Bach said in a statement.

The one-hour walk will begin at 5 p.m. outside the City Administration Building, 30 S. Nevada Ave.

The walk is being presented by the city, COPPeR, the Cultural Office of the Pikes Peak Region, and the Pikes Peak Art Council.

Representatives from Concrete Couch will accompany the mayor.

The city described Concrete Couch as “a community-based organization that facilitates mural, sculpture, performance programs and other creative endeavors, by working collaboratively with schools, community centers, and government groups.”

“Concrete Couch’s goal is to have a fun experience, and celebrate our creative community, but ALSO to show Mr. Bach the value of these projects and his office of Sustainability and Innovation (which spearheaded this effort),” Stephen Wood, director of Concrete Couch, said in the email.

“Through these programs and other similar ones, we have saved the city $100,000 over the years (graffiti removal, maintenance of park structures, etc). Add to that the value of a stronger community, and increased commerce and investment (lots of studies to support this), then these are efforts to continue SUPPORTING!”

 

 

Schedule for proposed ‘no solicitation zone’

September 10th, 2012, 10:40 am by

Photo by Daniel J. Chacon

Here’s the schedule for the proposed no solicitation zone to fight panhandling downtown, according to a news release from the City Council:

Over the next two months, the “No Solicitation Zone” Ordinance schedule is as follows:

Monday, Sept. 10 – Informal City Council meeting. City Attorney to answer questions from Council and receive direction. Public is welcome; public comment not permitted.

Monday, Sept. 24 – Informal City Council meeting. City Attorney to present draft ordinance. Additional changes may be made to ordinance. Public is welcome; public comment not permitted.

Tuesday, Oct. 9 – Formal City Council meeting. First reading of ordinance. Public welcome; public comment permitted.

Tuesday, Oct. 23 – Formal City Council meeting. Possible second reading of ordinance. Public welcome; public comment permitted.

All meetings will begin at 1 p.m. and will be held in the Council Chambers located on the third floor of City Hall at 107 N. Nevada Avenue.

This schedule is tentative and could change based on Council direction or decision.

Click here to find out when downtown surveillance cameras will be installed

May 29th, 2012, 2:47 pm by

No need to wear a mask this Halloween to avoid the Police Department’s downtown surveillance cameras.

The department doesn’t anticipate to install the cameras until after Halloween.

“At this point, the anticipated date of installation is the first week of November,” police spokeswoman Barbara Miller said in an email.

“The surveillance cameras have not yet been ordered as the Chief wanted to insure (sic) a fair bid process was conducted.  Because of that, an RFP usually adds 2 months to the estimated timeline,” she wrote.

The cameras will be installed along Tejon Street, but exactly where has not yet been determined.

“Exact locations have not been confirmed as committee members are determining the most cost effective measures when selecting the locations; ie, utilizing existing infrastructure and staying on city or utility property such as light poles or traffic light poles,” she wrote.

“That being said, Tejon will still be the main street with the lights being positioned every few blocks to include a camera at Acacia Park.”

 

 

Czelatdko calls Bach’s downtown team ‘shortsighted’

May 11th, 2012, 10:44 am by

City Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko, who represents downtown, is giving Mayor Steve Bach’s Downtown Solutions Team a piece of her mind.

Czelatdko sent the group the following email:

I wanted to thank those of you who give up your time, your money, your mornings, your weekends in order to improve upon downtown Colorado Springs.

I think that the intentional exclusion of the legislative body of this City, the absence in representation of a young professional, and poor output of communication, is extremely shortsighted on the part of the downtown solutions team.

I hear directly from citizens and business owners what they like and dislike about downtown. They want action and they want leaders who are willing to cooperate, recognize the existing value in this community, support projects that will enhance, and have the courage to implement changes. If you do not see that willingness then I ask you to use your influential voices and get them out of the city, out of leadership, and off boards.

The recent recommendation from the transit solutions team is to remove FREX. Where is our regional thinking? *Please see video below of Hickenlooper commenting on COS and how successful communities recognize the positive impacts a comprehensive transportation system has on a City.  Their recommendation removes the only connection other than interstate between COS and Denver.  It will put more drivers on the road putting an additional strain on an already compromised infrastructure. Professionals may have to move out. No options were discussed with the State for funding, nor County, or even discussed with the PPRTA board which actually provides the funding. Council heard at the presentation that with the extra funding  “we can possibly improve local routes”.  There is no guarantee to improve fixed routes locally because transit is not a priority for this administration.  Last year, I was the Council member who advocated for additional money for streets and to increase the weekday transit so people could get home from their job shifts. It failed.  Council was told publicly that for 2012, administration would look at additional sales tax revenues coming in and funding for improved transportation could be discussed.  Those additional funds have supposably been spent already. Council could and should in my opinion, bring forward an appropriation for increased fixed routes.  Unfortunately, it has been confirmed legally and reminded often, that appropriated funds can not direct City administration to implement any additional services. You are all very intelligent, dedicated people.  Please tell me one thriving downtown or City, where transportation isn’t a key part of their success?

It is May 5, 2012. There has not been one discussion of 2013 budget or project priorities between City Council, Steve B, and this administration. Millions of dollars in appropriations are coming forward last minute under the guise of being “mission critical”, and are foolishly being approved by us on Council without any detailed conversation, involvement, or bigger picture plans. My questions for you are what is this mission for this City?  for public safety? For infrastructure care? For downtown?

COS is the second largest City in the state and the largest County by population and area. With the willingness of our citizens and leaders to serve, there should be no reason to keep community solution building to a select few.

Listen especially from 10:00-11:15 minutes. Most of talk is cycling related but the idea of comprehensive transit options, branding, economic development, and commitment to projects all are mentioned and applicable to our City.

Sincerely,

Lisa Czelatdko (sa-lot-ko)

District 3 City Councilmember

City of Colorado Springs

Hente ‘very concerned’ about spending under Bach

March 28th, 2012, 8:58 am by

Saying he was worried about the “financial aspects” of a proposal to buy surveillance cameras to install downtown, City Council President Scott Hente voted in opposition Tuesday.

Hente said he wanted to see the “big picture financials” given that the Bach administration has been bringing supplemental budget appropriations in recent weeks with plans to bring more.

“I’m very worried about this from a financial standpoint,” Hente said.

“I’ve been doing this for nine years,” he added, referring to his time on council. “I’m probably more concerned now even than I was a couple years ago about the financial future of this city, and I just want to see the big picture. I don’t know how we can keep piecemealing this and figure out how it’s going to fit.”

Here’s the video:

YouTube Preview Image

Downtown surveillance cameras up for vote

March 27th, 2012, 12:51 pm by

A motion by Councilman Val Snider on Tuesday to postpone a proposal for surveillance cameras downtown died on a 3-5 vote.

Only Snider and Council President Scott Hente and President Pro Tem Jan Martin voted in favor of the motion.

Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko is absent.

YouTube Preview Image

Leigh: Surveillance cameras multiply police force

March 27th, 2012, 9:31 am by

Councilman Tim Leigh used his electronic newsletter today to make the case for surveillance cameras downtown.

The City Council will consider the proposal today on first reading. The meeting starts at 1 p.m. at City Hall, 107 N. Nevada Ave.

Here is Leigh’s newsletter:

Is the downtown is safe or not? How do you feel about sending your 13 year old daughter, granddaughter, or niece, (or for that matter), your wife to the downtown?   Exactly.  .  .

The point of installing cameras in the downtown is to help ensure greater public safety.

Cameras multiply the eyes watching downtown which help the police department respond to any call for action quickly.  Cameras are not a panacea.  They are merely 1 arrow in a broad public safety quiver.  They are a single step in the right (direction).

Cameras are a force multiplier

– A force multiplier is simply a way to multiply the number of police officers

– A larger police force prevents unnecessary criminal or other unruly activity

The capital cost for cameras is roughly equivalent to the annualized cost of 2 foot-patrol officers

– Once the capital cost is made, there are no additional capital costs

– Once the capital cost is made, there are no legacy costs

– Legacy costs include health insurance

– Legacy costs include PERA

Cameras are the least expensive way to watch-for nefarious activity in the downtown

Why should a tax payer from outside the downtown be willing to pay for cameras? – because we need a safe downtown.  People who study these issues say, “As the downtown goes, so goes the city”.  If we want a robust city, we must have a vibrant downtown.

To create vibrancy, we need greater population and financial density downtown.  (For reference, think of shopping mall foot traffic.)

Without greater population and financial density, desirable shops cannot locate downtown because they can’t afford the rent

Without greater population and financial density, the value of downtown commercial buildings decreases

– Decreasing property values produces attendant decreases in commercial property tax revenue to the general fund

Decreasing revenue in the general fund decreases the city’s ability to pay for other public safety needs; roads, parks, pools, and the general promotion of a high quality of life

To create population and financial density we need primary employer’s downtown.   To attract primary employers downtown, it needs to be safe.  Included in the mix of promoting downtown safety and vibrancy are cameras.

Pay attention. Be informed.  Keep it real.