City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'medical marijuana' Tag

Mayoral, council candidates take on medical marijuana tonight

March 21st, 2011, 9:23 am by

Two mayoral hopefuls and 10 City Council candidates are scheduled to speak tonight at the Colorado Springs Medical Cannabis Council‘s monthly networking event.

“Candidates will have a chance to speak about their campaign goals, and of course, the hot topic of medical marijuana in Colorado Springs,” Jessica Hogan, the council’s spokeswoman, said in an e-mail.

The event, which starts at 6:30 p.m., is at the Warehouse Restaurant and Gallery, 25 W. Cimarron.

It’s free and open to the public.

The two mayoral candidates scheduled to attend are Councilman Tom Gallagher, who spearheaded a medical marijuana task force along with Councilman Sean Paige, and businessman Richard Skorman.

The council candidates scheduled to attend are Paige, David Jensen, Michael Merrifield, Tony Carpenter, Dawn Lloyd and the so-called Reform Team: Ed Bircham, Douglas Bruce, Richard Bruce, Helen Collins and Gretchen Kasameyer.

“We invited everyone, so  hopefully more will attend tonight,” Hogan said.

Quote of the Day

February 11th, 2011, 1:07 pm by

“There’s a lot of smoke in that question.”

– mayoral candidate Buddy Gilmore said Thursday night during the Pikes Peak Firearms Coalition mayoral forum.

Gilmore was responding to moderator Jeff Crank, who asked the candidates: “Have any of you received money from those in the MMJ industry – medical marijuana industry? If so, how much and from whom, and would you support guns in pot shops?”

After his initial response, which drew loud laughter, Gilmore said he has not “not received any money or any sort of in-kind contributions, any sort of green things from those guys.”

Gilmore said guns should be allowed in dispensaries.

“Right now, like it or not, they’re a legitimate business. You look at other legitimate businesses around town and ask yourself,  ‘Should you be allowed to carry in those places?’ And the answer is yes… I think that as long they’re law-abiding citizens within the realm of our city right now, that they should be able to carry guns.”

Quote of the Day

January 22nd, 2011, 10:55 am by

“Running for public office while ignoring the MMJ community is like competing on American Idol with an intentional wardrobe malfunction; you just don’t do it.”

— Micah Benjamin Walker Will, commenting on Facebook about the Colorado Springs Medical Cannabis Council backing Councilman Tom Gallagher for mayor.

Medical marijuana advocates rally for Gallagher

January 20th, 2011, 12:10 am by

The Colorado Springs Medical Cannabis Council is infusing itself into the mayor’s race.

The group is calling on its members to show up in force today (Thursday) when Councilman Tom Gallagher formally announces his bid for mayor.

“With the new ‘strong mayor’ (form of government), it is vital that we have someone in the office that appreciates not only our patients but also our contribution to the community,” Director Tanya Garduno said in a mass e-mail Wednesday.

“Tom has proven that he would be that person for us,” she said.

Garduno called Gallagher, who spearheaded efforts to regulate the industry in Colorado Springs, “one of our most logical and respected” council members.

“As you know, Tom has spent hundreds of volunteer hours working on the Medical Marijuana Taskforce and has continuously defended the industry and patients against numerous attacks from industry opponents, including citizens and city officials. He has attended dozens of our events and events around the state supporting our cause. I can’t think of anyone who has sacrificed more personal time with no real stake in our game,” she wrote in the e-mail.

“As a special THANK YOU, I am inviting you to join me at his press conference (today) to show our support,” she added. “This is a small favor to ask for someone who has done so much for us.”

Gallagher’s formal announcement will be at 1 p.m. on the third floor of 31 N. Tejon St.

Quote of the Day

December 29th, 2010, 4:13 pm by

“I don’t have the information on those two issues. But I know I will have that information as I move forward. I’m not saying that they’re not important issues to us, but you called me out of the blue, literally about two hours after I turned in my paperwork.”

Merv Bennett, who filed papers today to run for City Council, said in a telephone interview that he didn’t have enough information to form an opinion when asked whether he supported the Southern Delivery System and future water rate increases to fund it or the direction the council has been going in terms of dealing with the medical marijuana industry.

Bennett, who has lived in Colorado Springs for 38 years, is president and CEO of the YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region.

“I don’t have the knowledge or the data right in front of me right now to give you an opinion on that,” he said about SDS, which is one of the largest water projects in the West and will double water rates by 2016.

“That’s one I really know the least about probably right now. That’s not one I would be willing to comment on,” he said about medical marijuana.

Quote of the Day

December 17th, 2010, 5:39 pm by

“Is it infused?”

– Vice Mayor Larry Small asked after Councilman Sean Paige gave him a chocolate Santa Claus. Paige, who spearheaded a medical marijuana task force, is considered a friend of the industry and has admitted smoking pot in the past.

Sales tax revenue from pot poised to exceed $500,000 in 2010

December 9th, 2010, 4:10 pm by

The city of Colorado Springs is on pace to collect more than $500,000 in sales tax revenue from the medical marijuana industry by the end of the year.

The October sales of medical marijuana and marijuana-infused products generated $56,782 in sales tax revenue for the city, according to figures released today by the city’s Sales Tax Department.

To date, the city has collected $436,330 in sales tax revenue from medical marijuana.

The city has been collecting more than $50,000 in sales tax revenue from the medical marijuana industry for the past five consecutive months.

Talk about a growth industry.

The city collected $73,504 total in sales tax revenue from pot in all of 2009.

Planning Commission blasted for denying public testimony

November 23rd, 2010, 11:23 am by

The Planning Commission has sparked a flare-up with City Council members for denying the public an opportunity last week to weigh in on proposed zoning regulations for medical marijuana businesses.

“That was just wrong of the Planning Commission,” Councilman Tom Gallagher said during yesterday’s council meeting.

“It’s about public process, and they need to understand that,” he said. “They may not like hearing the public’s comments, but to not afford them that opportunity was not copacetic, at least not with me.”

The chairman of the commission, Kevin Butcher, essentially told the public that he didn’t want to waste his time.

Mayor Lionel Rivera seemed surprised the commission didn’t allow public comment.

“That’s news to me,” he said. “I thought the Planning Commission’s session was a public hearing to basically tell your planning commissioners what you think. They did not allow public comment?”

City Attorney Patricia Kelly told the mayor and council that she would check into it. She said the commission “traditionally” allows public comment on pending ordinances.

“I definitely need more information,” Rivera told Kelly.

“I will get that for you,” Kelly responded.

I’ll save you the trouble, Ms. Kelly.

Here’s what happened:

After hearing the changes that had been made the initial proposal, Butcher, the commission chairman, asked his colleagues whether they had a “desire” to hear public testimony.

Commissioner Edward Gonzalez said the public should have a chance to comment specifically on the changes to the initial proposal.

“I’d like to give them the opportunity to present their ideas to the commission,” he said.

Commissioner Carla Hartsell agreed and seconded his motion.

But Commissioner Donald Magill made the case against taking public testimony.

He said the proposed changes, which imposed much stricter zoning regulations on the industry, were more “mechanical” and didn’t change the “substance” of the proposal.

“I think we’ve had an enormous amount of public input,” he said. “I just don’t believe that there’s a possibility that any new information can come forward that we haven’t already heard.”

Butcher sided with Magill, saying the public would have an opportunity to comment on the proposed land-use regulations when they went before the council next month.

Butcher also said he didn’t want to waste his time taking public testimony.

“I think it’s a better use of time for not only those of us up here but those in the audience,” he said. “You’ll have the ability to have your comments based on what we do today. I think that’s fair.”

People who attended the morning meeting expecting to comment were furious.

Some interpreted their refusal to allow public testimony as a sign that they had already made up their minds on the new, more strict zoning regulations.

To watch the planning commissioners debate whether to allow public testimony, click here and fast forward to about 1:19.

Suthers’ marijuana assertion goes up in smoke

November 19th, 2010, 10:50 am by

Janet Suthers

Janet Suthers was right.

Well, sort of.

During yesterday’s Planning Commission meeting on proposed zoning regulations for the city’s medical marijuana industry, Suthers said: “Already we are seeing an increase in student expulsions for marijuana use and an increase in arrests for driving under the influence of marijuana.”

Her comment triggered the obvious question: Can you support that assertion?

Suthers replied via e-mail and sent links to four stories reporting increases in drug-related incidents in schools.

“The statistics are staggering, showing drug-related suspensions are up 31 percent, expulsions up 40 percent, and students caught selling illegal drugs on campus is up 15 percent,” 9NEWS in Denver reported.

“Altogether, the number of drug incidents reported by school districts rose 34 percent from 2008-09 to 2009-10,” Education News Colorado reported.

So, is marijuana — or medical marijuana for that matter – responsible for the spike?

Maybe.

Maybe not.

“The figures don’t reveal which drugs were involved,” Education News Colorado reported.

Dr. Barbara Cooper, chief equity and engagement officer for the Aurora Public School District, told 9NEWS she “wouldn’t feel comfortable” saying the number of medical marijuana dispensaries contributed to the increase “because we haven’t done any studies that allow us to go out and take a look and ask students those types of questions.”

Cooper told Education News Colorado that she didn’t want to speculate.

“I don’t think there’s a single reason for the increase,” she said.

And what about Suthers’ claim that there’s been an increase in arrests for driving under the influence of marijuana?

“It is my understanding that in a meeting of the Colorado Criminal Justice Commission on November 12th, the Department of Health reported a signficant increase in the blood tests for driving under the influence of marijuana,” Suthers said in the e-mail.

A spokesman for the state Department of Public Health and Environment said that statement is true.

“We’d have no way of knowing whether the person was a cardholder for medical marijuana or just a recreational marijuana smoker,” Mark Salley said in a telephone message. 

“But I can tell you we’ve seen an increase in THC samples that are coming back from our DUI-type sampling. So I’m confirming that,” he said. “I’m told that perhaps it’s approximately a 40 percent increase over the past year.”

Suthers’ husband, state Attorney General John Suthers, serves on the commission that received that information.

Suthers: Proliferation of pot shops may increase drug use among youth

November 18th, 2010, 2:06 pm by

Janet Suthers, a Planning Commission member who ignited a firestorm of controversy in September when she urged religious leaders to weigh in on zoning regulations for medical marijuana businesses, called today’s recommendation to City Council a “fair and balanced zoning policy.”

The commission is recommending a 1,000-foot buffer zone between medical marijuana dispensaries and a wide range of schools, from preschools to colleges and universities.

The commission is also recommending the same setback between dispensaries and residential child care facilities and drug and/or alcohol treatment facilities.

“Every planning commissioner brings life experiences to their position and their decisions,” Suthers said in a prepared statement. “I am a mother, a businesswoman and a former school board president. I am very concerned that the proliferation of centers will increase drug usage among our youth and undermine all the work that our community is doing to increase high school graduation rates. No amount of tax revenue will make up for that societal cost.”

Suthers, who is considering running for the City Council in April, is married to state Attorney General John Suthers.

In her prepared statement, Suthers also said that “already we are seeing an increase in student expulsions for marijuana use and an increase in arrests for driving under the influence of marijuana.”

However, she didn’t provide the data to back up that claim or cite her source. The Gazette sent Suthers an e-mail requesting that information.

Here is the full text of Suthers’ statement:

This is a very important issue for our entire community that could define our city for years to come.  I recognize that the Cannabis Council is an important stakeholder in this issue and I thank them for their valuable input.  However, they are not the only ones impacted by this policy.  The Planning Commission is a level playing field in which all community members can express their views.  It is the Planning Commission and not the Cannabis Council who is in the best position to recommend zoning and land use policy to City Council.  I am proud of our efforts to reach out to all institutions in our city and to invite everyone to participate.  Some institutions gave considerable input.  Others chose not to participate.  What I learned during these hearings was that there is a strong desire from our educational institutions for a buffer around schools.  This applies to early learning centers, pre-schools, K-12 education, colleges and universities.   

Every Planning Commissioner brings life experiences to their position and their decisions.  I am a mother, a businesswoman and a former school board president.  I am very concerned that the proliferation of centers will increase drug usage among our youth and undermine all the work that our community is doing to increase high school graduation rates.  No amount of tax revenue will make up for that societal cost.  Already we are seeing an increase in student expulsions for marijuana use and an increase in arrests for driving under the influence of marijuana.  A recent Harvard study confirmed the negative changes to the brain caused by smoking marijuana regularly before the age of sixteen. 

As a planning commissioner, I am also very uncomfortable approving ordinances for businesses that I know are in violation of federal law.   This is a major disconnect for me and has made my decision difficult.  The Denver Post has reported that legitimate medical marijuana users are less that 4% of the total market, yet we are going to extraordinary lengths to accommodate them. 

I have listened to the Cannabis Council and I understand that our zoning recommendation will impact some businesses.  However it is not the responsibility of the Planning Commission to manage risk for business owners.  Every one of these marijuana businesses knew that they were an illegal land use when they opened and they all knew that they were making financial investments before zoning and licensing regulations were developed. There were no guarantees.  It was their choice and their risk assumption. Additionally, If the federal government changes its enforcement policies, they could all still be shut down.  The risks and the rewards are theirs.      

  I support this motion because the zoning makes sense to me, because the 1000 foot buffer around schools is consistent with the federal No Child Left Behind  legislation for 1000 foot drug free zones around schools, because 1000 feet is the recommended buffer in Colorado HB 1284 which legalized dispensaries in Colorado and because our educational institutions have asked for it.  I also support 1000 foot buffers around drug treatment facilities because I respect their work and want to support their efforts.  I know that the entire Planning Commission listened carefully to all the testimony and gave this issue their best thinking. Given our many constraints as a land use review board, I believe that we are recommending to City Council a fair and balanced zoning policy.