Gazette
City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Merv Bennett' Tag

Quote of the Day

April 19th, 2012, 3:24 pm by

Time flies.

“One year ago today six new members were sworn into the City Council for the City of Colorado Springs, Merv Bennett, Lisa Czelatdko, Angela Dougan, Tim Leigh, Val Snider and myself. We took an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States, the Constitution of the State of Colorado and the Charter of the City of Colorado Springs. While this position has not always been easy, I am honored, as I know my colleagues are, to serve the Citizens of Colorado Springs to the best of my ability. Thank you for your support!” Councilwoman Brandy Williams wrote today on Facebook.

 

Councilman denies saying he couldn’t be objective

March 12th, 2012, 9:26 pm by

Councilman Merv Bennett, the former CEO of the YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region, says he plans to participate in the discussion and vote of a proposed contract between the Y and the city to operate six city-owned aquatic facilities.

Bennett said he got the OK from City Attorney Chris Melcher.

Bennett was quoted in the Indy as saying that he planned to recuse himself from voting on the proposed agreement because he couldn’t be objective.

Bennett denied making such a statement.

“I didn’t say I couldn’t be objective,” he said. “I don’t remember making that statement.”

YouTube Preview Image

City contributed millions to Southeast YMCA

March 12th, 2012, 9:50 am by

As Colorado Springs considers a five-year contract for the YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region to operate six city-owned aquatics facilities, City Council members are asking a lot of questions.

Who better to answer them than Councilman Merv Bennett, who served as CEO of the Y until his retirement last year.

Bennett, who plans to participate in the discussion and vote of the proposed contract after checking with the City Attorney’s Office, which said he didn’t have any conflicts of interests, answered questions from his colleagues in a long email this weekend.

Bennett cc’d Mayor Steve Bach, Chief of Staff Laura Neumann and Dan Dummermuth, the current CEO of the Y, in the email.

The city will subsidize the Y for any year-end shortfall “to the point of a break-even status” under the proposed contract.

For 2012, the subsidy is estimated at no more than $632,350.

Here is Bennett’s email:

I am doing this from memory so I will do my best.  Since I lived and breathed this every day for three years I am comfortable I am including all the data.  Lisa and Bernie, the information related to the USO was a part of the Southeast project so the answer to that question will be included within.

Since the early 1970s the YMCA recognized that the Southeast part of Colorado Springs was a community with many service needs and very little access.  This was primarily because the hard working folks in this part of our community could not afford to pay for the actual cost of providing the services.  For this reason, the YMCA built the Garden Ranch and Briargate facilities first to generate income (along with income generated at the Downtown Y) that could subsidize a facility in the Southeast part of Colorado Springs.  The folks in the Southeast did not want anything given to them, they just wanted it to be affordable according to their lower level of income. (At the time the Southeast Y was constructed the average household income in Briargate was around $72,000 but the average household income in the Southeast was $38,000)  When cost studies were done prior to construction it indicated about $450,000 in subsidy would be required annually.  This was based on a $3,000,000 annual budget.  Also, at that time the City parks department was using a national formula that said that nationally city recreations centers only generated revenue to cover 55-60% of their expenses as a national average. (To my knowledge this is still the high end of the average subsidy) This was a time when the City of Denver Recreation Centers were only generating enough income to cover 18% of  their expenses. This would mean that the City of Colorado would need to subsidize annually at a rate of 40-45% of expense.  This translates to annual subsidy of $1.2 – $1.35 Million per year.  The reason is due to operational styles and philosophies.  The Y generates most of its income (about 85%) from program fees and membership income with the remaining 15% from donations, gifts and grants.  The majority of the philanthropic support is provided in the Southeast, Fountain and  YMCA Camp Shady Brook (children’s resident camp).  However all YMCA branches utilize an income based rate scale and provide scholarships where needed for membership and programs.  Their philosophy is that “no one is turned away due to inability to pay”.  It has been for 134 years. The majority of this is provided to families, youth and seniors.  The Y raises in excess of $1 Million for this purpose each year in its own fundraising activities here in Colorado Spring and El Paso County.  The Y believes this is an indicator of a strong community and embraces social responsibility.  Financial records are required to assure that subsidy is provided where it is most needed to be accountable and responsible to the donors.  However, special circumstances are given careful consideration.

The Briargate YMCA was opened in December of 1998. (this also had a small but significant partnership with the City)  We had just conducted the largest capital campaign in Colorado Springs raising $7.6 Million.  The cost of construction was $7.8 million.  Our plan was to start of a project southeast in about 5 years. ( I was eager for a rest, capital campaigns are exhausting)  However, three months later the City, through Parks Director Paul Butcher, called and asked if we could work together on a project Southeast.  The City was working on what became the Springs Community Improvement Program (SCIP). The City believed a recreational facility in the Southeast part of the City was critical but they knew they would not be able to financially operate it. The concept was that the City would capitalize the construction and the YMCA would assume operational responsibility.  It was anticipate SCIP would provide $5.5 million which we calculated would construct a facility of approximately 35,000 – 40,000 sq. ft.  Since the YMCA did not have land in the southeast part of Colorado Springs, the City offered the present 5 acre site that was a dedicated park site that they had decided to not develop.  The YMCA agreed to do this since it would allow services to this area much quicker and meet a priority need of the City and the YMCA.

A couple of things occurred immediately after the YMCA agreed in principle to the partnership.  The Briargate YMCA (with 50,000 people within a 3 mile radius of the building) filled to capacity and exceeded its 3 year projection within three months of opening.  Second, when doing the demographic study of the 3 mile radius of the Southeast site, we found there were already over 90,000 people in this area with specific and dramatic recreational, social and family needs.  i.e. 29% of that community were single parent households and 48% of the community were military family households who behave a single parent households during deployments.  This totals over 75% of this community.  This resulted in the YMCA recognizing that building a facility half the size of Briargate to serve twice the population would be inadequate.  As a result another exhaustive capital campaign was approved and executed.  To shorten this slightly, the final amount from SCIP was $4.6 million and the YMCA raised $7.2 million.  The final cost was $11.8 million.  Because of the operational support that would be needed, it was important that all the money be raised to eliminate or minimize any debt service.

During the capital campaign and while SCIP was going through an extensive community process, the USO Board of Directors (The US0 was a separate 501c3 corporation operating as a subsidiary of the YMCA) conducted an extensive strategic planning process.  The result was that the local USO Board decided to amiably disaffiliate with the National USO organization and affiliate with the National Armed Services YMCA.  This was done for one major reason and a minor issue.  The minor issue related to confusion in fundraising, the National USO was conducting (and still does) extensive fundraising within our area.  This made it more difficult for the local USO to be successful with the fundraising that would meet the specific needs of our local military community.  However the more significant reason was a recognition of conflicting missions. (both missions are valid and important)  The National USO had a primary focus on serving military personnel  traveling or overseas while the local Board of Directors felt their mission should be focused on serving military families at home. This is the mission of the Armed Services YMCA.   As a result, the National USO, the Armed Services YMCA, the local USO Board and the local YMCA Board all agreed to the new affiliation plan.

I tell you the above to answer the USO question but to also help explain that the new Armed Services YMCA Board agreed to become the advisory board for the Southeast Armed Services YMCA (Southeast Y)  That structure continues very successfully to this day.

Now the agreement information between the YMCA and the City as it relates to the Southeast Y.  The City has leased the land to the YMCA for $1 per year.  Because it is a dedicated park site it could not be gifted or sold.  The City could not gift bonded money, so the agreement is as follows:

  • The aquatics portion of the building would be under the ownership of the City of Colorado Springs with the YMCA as the exclusive operator.
  • The City would depreciate the aquatics portion of the building over their normal 25 year depreciation schedule.
  • When the depreciation is completed and it is no longer on the City’s books as an asset, it would be given to the YMCA for $1.
  • During this time the YMCA would be responsible for all staffing, operation, deferred maintenance and additional capital development that might be needed.
  • The YMCA would provide daily usage at the same or comparable rate as provided by the City at the Memorial Park and Cottonwood Facilities.
  • The City would not be responsible for any operating subsidy although the YMCA was not prohibited from asking.  (to my knowledge, not operational funds from the City have be requested or provided)
  • The City could have a program office in the building.  (to my knowledge this has never been requested by the City)
  • The Harrison School District was also our partner during the project and provided communication to the local community, the School District also requested the building be moved to the West end of the site to give a campus atmosphere to Sierra HS and to allow them to provide additional parking for the facility on the West side(after 3pm).  This has proven to be a great aspects of this collaborative venture.
  • The Southeast YMCA opened in April of 2002 and has required annual subsidy each year averaging between $250,000-$450,000.
  • Each year YMCAs and City’s from around our country come and visit this model.  In my last year as CEO the City of Syracuse NY and Ventura County California, along with their YMCA counterparts visited.

Believe it or not I could make this several pages longer but I think I have provided an overview of a change in operational philosophy where our City and YMCA recognized they could do much more together than they could ever do separately.  It resulted in the City recognizing they could cause great services to be provided to the community without being responsible for delivering them.

One other thing, when we did the planning for the Southeast YMCA, I insisted on have the responsibility for the engineering, architect design and hiring of the contractor (GE Johnson).  If we were going to take responsibility for the operation and maintenance of the City owned pools, I wanted to be assured that they were developed and constructed in a manner that could be successfully and sustainably operated.  Also, all contractors were from Colorado Springs and 60% of the work force that built the building lived in the 80910 zip code. (but that is another story)

Sorry for the epistle but inquiring minds ought to know!

Merv

PS  Because our City legal department has indicated I do not have any conflict of interest, I will be participating in the discussion and vote.

 

YMCA may take over 6 city pools

March 7th, 2012, 11:25 am by

The YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region may step in to operate six city-owned aquatic facilities in Colorado Springs.

The mayor’s office announced Wednesday that the Parks, Recreation & Cultural Services Department will present details of a proposed agreement with the YMCA during Monday’s informal City Council meeting.

“Per the proposed agreement, the City will subsidize the YMCA for any shortfall experienced at the City’s aquatic facilities. Based on proposed budgets, the subsidy is estimated at no more than $632,350 for 2012. By utilizing the remaining subsidy already budgeted for Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center, estimated at $208,000, a supplemental appropriation of $425,000 is necessary. Should revenues come in higher than budgeted, or expenses turn out to be lower than anticipated, the subsidy amount will be appropriately reduced,” according to city documents.

The council will be asked to vote on funding in support of the proposed agreement the following day.

“We are thrilled with the potential of a partnership with the YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region moving forward with City Council’s approval,” Chief of Staff Laura Neumann said in a statement.

“The City has a great history of working with the YMCA, and we optimistically look forward to being able to open our swimming pools again for the benefit of our entire community,” she said.

When the city terminated its contract with private operators Kevin and Tina Dessart, at least one council member speculated that it was because the Bach administration wanted to let the YMCA take over the pools.

Councilman Merv Bennett, who was elected last year, was the longtime CEO of the YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region. Bennett did not immediately return a call for comment.

Councilwoman Brandy Williams said she wanted to know whether the proposed contract was competitively bid.

“The reason the laws were set up the way that they are was to prevent people from getting into office and then simply handing contracts to people. There’s usually a competitive bid process because, over time, citizens have seen that that could become an issue and it’s to prevent anything like that from happening,” she said.

“There’s at least a process that the public can see how the decision was made, the bids that came in, things of that nature, so there’s more transparency brought to the issue,” Williams added.

Williams said the YMCA looked into taking over some of the city’s pools the first time the city said it was looking for partners from the private sector. She said the YMCA concluded at that time that it wasn’t cost-effective.

“They didn’t even present the bid because in their due diligence process, the math didn’t work,” she said. “The difference (under this agreement) is that $600,000 in funds from the city. That’s the difference, and that begs the question: Could the Dessarts have used that $600,000 much like the Y is using it and ran the pools? Was that question asked?’

The YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region has been in the for 134 years.

“We believe this partnership with the city will enhance the overall quality of life and ease the burden of government,” Dan Dummermuth, president and CEO of the YMCA of the Pikes Peak Region, said in a statement.

“The YMCA strengthens the foundation of our community through youth development, healthy living and social responsibility,” he said.

According to the city, here are the highlights of the proposed agreement:

  • Target date for finalized agreement:  April 5, 2012
    • 5-year agreement
  • Target pool opening: May 28, 2012
  • Aquatics facilities included in the agreement:
    • Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center,
    • Aquatics and Fitness Center at Memorial Park,
    • Portal Pool, Wilson Ranch Pool,
    • Monument Valley Pool, and
    • Prospect Lake Beach.
      • The only City facility not being considered is Valley Hi outdoor pool due to its proximity to the Southeast YMCA, the Aquatics and Fitness Center at Memorial Park and the Prospect Lake Beach.
  • City will maintain ownership of all sites
  • YMCA will manage and operate the City’s aquatic facilities including all programming.
  • YMCA will apply its operating policies and provide an affordable rate structure across all sites, as well as financial assistance when needed
    • Including the Income-Based Rate Scale to ensure membership is available and affordable to all
  • All YMCA centers and City recreation centers will offer reciprocal use of facilities through membership.
  • Non-membership day passes for pools will be continued; however, a reduced rate will be available to members
  • YMCA will be responsible for operating income and expenses;
    • Should there be a year-end short fall; the City will subsidize the YMCA to the point of a break-even status.
    • Should the YMCA realize excess revenue at year-end, those funds will be shared between both parties.
  • 2012 City budget supplemental appropriation request = $425,000
    • Based on estimated operating expenses minus revenues for each site.
    • Should revenues come in higher than budgeted, or expenses lower than anticipated, the subsidy amount will be appropriately reduced.

Herpin: Changes to mayor’s budget not a ‘power play’

December 19th, 2011, 11:11 am by

An editorial in The Gazette last week described Colorado Springs City Council members who voted to override five of Mayor Steve Bach’s vetoes as spoiled brats, saying they were rebelling “like angry teenagers given a curfew.”

“Only two council members, Angela Dougan and Tim Leigh, consistently voted against overriding the mayor’s responsible vetoes,” the editorial stated.

“Seven others — Merv Bennett, Lisa Czelatdko, Scott Hente, Bernie Herpin, Jan Martin, Val Snider and Brandy Williams — chose rebellion over responsible financial restraint. They chose to show Bach who is in charge, and they did so with disregard for taxpayers’ interests and the challenges facing city finances.”

In an email to Wayne Laugesen, the newspaper’s editorial page editor, Herpin wrote that he saw his support for council’s additions to the 2012 budget “not as a ‘power play,’ but as concern for our community.”

Herpin provided a copy of the email to Laugesen to the newspaper’s news department, which operates independently of the editorial department.

“I’d like to share with you my response to today’s Gazette editorial on this subject,” Herpin said Friday.  “Please keep two things in mind:  Our changes represent 0.135% of the total 2012 budget, and, even with these additions, we added $371,000 more to our reserves than the Mayor requested in his initial budget.”

Here is the full text of Herpin’s email to Laugesen:

Wayne,

I saw my support for the 2012 Colorado Springs budget additions by council not as a “power play”, but as concern for our community.  I few things you didn’t mention in today’s editorial:

- In his remarks at his swearing in, apparently recognizing the importance of well maintained parks to our community, Mayor Bach asked for more than $800,000 for additional parks watering and maintenance.  Council approved that request 8-0 (one member was on vacation).  Turns out, that money came from “salary savings” from unfilled positions within police, fire, and other departments.

- The Mayor stated he asked the police and fire departments to cut $1.6 million from their 2011 budget for 2012.  And then he turned around and established a $1.5 million “contingency” fund that he could spend any way he wanted without reporting to council who has the authority, and responsibility, for funding city government.  Most of that $1.6 million came from eliminating unfilled positions and “efficiencies”.  As a long time supporter of our public safety, I would have gladly supported an increase in their budget.

- With our changes to the proposed 2012 budget, even after overriding his vetoes on 3 spending items totaling $302,295, we increased the amount going into reserves by $371,000 more than the Mayor had requested in his initial budget.

Mayor Bach, rightly so and with my full support, has made job creation the number one goal of his administration.  Colorado Springs has been recognized as one of the top places in our country to live, work, and play by several organizations.  I think the “play” attribute is a key component in achieving the Mayor’s goal.  We all remember 2010 with no trash cans or bathrooms in parks, 6 foot high weeds in the medians, a third of our streetlights turned off, and other cost cutting measures that council took to maintain a balanced budget.  Our fund balance (reserves) were reduced.  How could we expect company CEOs looking to relocate out of California to look favorably on Colorado Springs when they consider the quality of life for their employees?

When things picked up a little for 2011, we didn’t foolishly throw money into hiring back all laid off employees and go on a spending spree.  We made reasonable restorations and, at the same time, increased our fund balance.

Mayor Bach took a very conservative approach to the projected 2012 revenue.  He stated he feared we would increase that projection and spend more money.  Not only did we not do that, we increased the amount going to our reserves and made only a very modest increase in spending and offset that spending by savings in other areas.

What did we fund and why?

Code Enforcement:  In 2009 – 2010, code enforcement officers were reduced.  Neighborhood organizations complained about the lack of adequate code enforcement.  Code enforcement officers are a part of the police department and play an important role in ensuring the public health and safety and maintaining property values.  In emails on city services, code violations complaints are near the top.  Our code enforcement officers do a great job, but they are under staffed.  This addition of an additional officer will help relieve this.  It should also be noted that, even though council funded an additional code enforcement officer, the Mayor has unilateral control over hiring and firing and he can choose not to fill this position.  Cost:  $84,295 salary and benefits

Tennis Court Maintenance:  As I stated above, in order to attract more jobs to our community, a prospective employer will consider the amenities that a community provides for their employees: arts, cultural venues, recreational opportunities, parks, trails, open space, and other quality of life factors do play into their decision when comparing our community to other possible locations for their business.  $175,000 for sorely needed tennis court maintenance, out of a $222,650,500 budget is a small investment and, leveraged properly for grant matching can result in significant improvements.  There is a tennis organization that is going to work with our Parks Department to raise additional private funds and matching grants.  Cost: $175,000

Legislative Assistance/Communications Person:  The Mayor, who hired a “social media” staff member at $56,000 plus benefits, controls all of city staff.  As the legislative body for our city, we need a full-time person to watch what is happening in the state and federal legislatures to alert us on things that may impact us.  During the Colorado legislative session, he works with our state legislators to keep them abreast of issues of importance to our city.  Council needs to do a better job of communicating with the media and our citizens.  This person will be our advisor on how to do that.  Cost: $43,000 salary and benefits

Flowers for Springs in Bloom:  In 2011, flowers for the Springs in Bloom program were purchased from a nursery in Penrose, Colorado, while in the past they were grown in city owned greenhouses by existing staff and volunteers.  This was a recommendation, since only the Mayor can direct staff, that we should keep Colorado Springs taxpayer money in Colorado Springs whenever possible and we get better results with locally grown flowers.  Cost: $0

PPACG/CML DuesSince Council members, not the Mayor, participate in these organizations, Council believes the responsibility for funding our membership in them belongs with Council.  Cost:  $0

The $302,295 of additional expenditures authorized by Council in overriding the Mayor’s vetoes, is 0.135% of the total budget.  The final budgeted expenditures of $222,650,500 are $801,000 less than the projected 2012 revenue of $223,451,500 thus adding to our reserves rather than drawing from them as we did in 2009 – 2010.  I’d say that Council, and the Mayor, have taken a conservative and responsible approach to funding our city for 2012.

Sincerely,

Bernie Herpin

Council Member District 4

 

Leigh advocates $96,000-a-year salary for City Council

November 15th, 2011, 10:24 am by

When Colorado Springs voters approved a switch to a strong-mayor form of government, a $96,000-a-year salary for the mayor was part of the package.

Now, it’s time that City Council members were paid $96,000, too, said City Councilman Tim Leigh, who was elected in April.

“Frankly, I think that the salary should be more than that,” he said.

“Look at it this way,” he said. “You have nine well-intended, part-time people trying to run a multiple billion dollar enterprise (that includes oversight of Colorado Springs Utilities and Memorial Health System). That is silly on its face and should be insulting to the citizens of Colorado Springs.”

Council members are currently paid $6,250 a year.

Under Leigh’s proposal, the total cost to taxpayers would be $864,000.

Leigh, who was elected to a two-year term, said he plans to bring a proposal to increase council members’ pay in front of council before his term is up.

“This is not like some hidden, quiet, behind-the-scenes conversation,” he said. “It is something that people talk about all the time, yet we have not had the gravitas to bring it up and get right out in front of everybody currently.”

Councilman Merv Bennett said he would not advocate a pay increase.

“I’m doing this because I want to serve the community, and I knew what I was getting into from the beginning,” Bennett said. “Now, having said that, if personally I was not involved, I would be supportive of that.”

Bennett, who puts in up to 45 hours a week as a councilman, said a salary increase for council members would be a “positive thing” for the future. But he said he would prefer that the public — not council — push the idea.

“I think the pay for council is something that it’s important for our future. It’s not what I’m focused on right now,” he said. “I think we’ve got other issues that we need to address, like the economy and jobs and Memorial (Health System), the things like that.”

Councilwoman Brandy Williams said council members “definitely” need to be paid more than $6,250 a year.

“I don’t know that $96,000 is where I would start at,” she said. “But I think for a city of 416,000, that we really need to look at what we are paying our representatives.”

In Denver, the council president is paid $87,539 annually and council members are paid $78,173.

Pueblo pays its council president $10,800 a year and its council members $8,400 a year.

Leigh said he wants to “engage the citizens in this conversation” and encouraged them to contact their council members to express their opinions about a proposed salary increase.

“Here’s where I get beat up: I get beat up because people don’t think I care about what people say. That’s totally wrong,” said Leigh, who was criticized for saying that a public hearing in October on the mayor’s proposed 2012 budget was a waste of time.

Leigh said his proposal could trigger accusations that he is trying to “feather his bed,” which he said isn’t true. Still, he said he would accept more pay while in office.

“I would not be against accepting pay if the citizens voted for that,” he said. “In other words, I wouldn’t say that it had to be something that would start six years from now.”

Councilman dismisses public input on 2012 budget

October 31st, 2011, 9:29 am by

City Councilman Tim Leigh, who missed an emotional public hearing on the proposed 2012 budget last week, said he had residents on his mind while he was in the Big Apple.

But, according to Leigh, the public hearing was essentially a waste of time.

“Frankly, by this time in the municipal budgeting process, any changes brought by special pleading by special interests are likely borne from emotion and not empiricism, and should be discounted on their face,” Leigh wrote in his weekly newsletter.

Leigh, who supports Mayor Steve Bach’s spending plan, traveled to New York City last week to the JP Morgan Utility Conference with officials from Colorado Springs Utilities.

Leigh “thought he could help save the city money in the long run by attending,” according to the Indy. He also told the weekly that citizen concerns wouldn’t factor into his decision-making on the mayor’s budget.

“It’s not like I would have come away and had any earth-shattering recommendation after watching it,” he said. “… My position’s pretty clear in how I feel about the budget.”

Councilman Merv Bennett also missed the town hall meeting. The Indy reported that Bennett missed the meeting because he had made a commitment to take care of a “loved one” after a surgery.

Dozens of people attended the public hearing.

About 40 people signed up to speak, including several people in wheelchairs.

Among them was Sharon King, a 64-year-old woman who has brain damage from multiple sclerosis.

“Right now, I’m not sure which direction to go to get home,” King said in an interview outside City Hall.

King asked a reporter to point her in the right direction.

In his newsletter, Leigh called the town hall meeting a “special contrivance.”

“I actually thought about placing a mannequin or an orange cone (with my face painted with a moustache on it) in my chair so folks would know how much I was thinking about them while I was traveling; and I was, and I do care,” Leigh wrote.

“I just think it’s horribly disingenuous and hypocritical to let the citizenry believe they can make last minute pitches and pleas and thereby modify a Quarter of Billion Dollar budget that took a team of professional accountants and budget planners nearly a year to create.  And, while I appeared MIA, those who know me know I’m available and approachable for frank conversation anytime.  I just believe that special meetings for special-interest groups, while politically correct and appealing, (and good for ratings), are mostly non-productive.  Alternatively, my time and our trip to the Big Apple was very productive,” he wrote.

Here’s an excerpt from Leigh’s newsletter:

We could beat the proposed budget to death because we all have good ideas.  But, at some point we have to let it go.  But, so I may stay in touch with my politically correct old self, here’s my quick two cents:

POOLS:  Instead of subsidizing swimming pools, we should close them and purchase everyone who uses a public pool a free YMCA membership.  We’d eliminate operational and capital costs associated with owning a public pool system and save hundreds of thousands every year.  As it is, our pools can’t carry their own water.

CONTRIBUTIONS:  Let’s cut contribution to the Colorado Municipal League (and other such membership organizations) by half and eliminate the Intergovernmental Affairs Liaison position.  Our combined savings would be around $100,000.  If we simply direct those savings to Parks, we’d re-open the Prospect Lake Beach House and re-fill Prospect Lake every spring.

ADMINISTRATION OF GOVERNMENT:  Let’s move the Councilor’s offices to the City Administration Building producing operational efficiencies and financial savings while coincidentally solving personal safety concerns.  Heck, if we played in the same sandbox, we might actually play together.

TOWN HALL MEETINGS:  Citizens should talk to their elected officials more than once a year at a one-time, 2 hour meeting.   To that end, we should hold regular monthly town hall meetings.  These meetings could be very informal over coffee or wine and could provide a venue for citizens to showcase their programs and help drive public policy throughout the year – not just in a panic at budget time.

COUNCILOR’S SALARIES:  For every dollar a councilor can find in savings to the budget by optimization he can keep ½.  I’m sure I just found a couple of hundred thousand dollars with my ideas.  .  .  .

I know my ideas will not be seriously considered, nor should they be.  They are “off-the-cuff” as are many of the ideas brought forward in the town hall meeting where emotion and spur of the moment thinking reigns supreme.  We need to discuss our “budget process” and the role of council in that process.  We don’t need 9 city managers.

Council examines UV system that zaps bacteria from wastewater

October 25th, 2011, 9:31 am by

Photo by Daniel J. Chacón

Members of the Colorado Springs City Council toured the Las Vegas Wastewater Treatment Plant on Monday.

During the tour, city officials got a first-hand look at a new ultraviolet disinfection system that treats the wastewater before it is discharged in Fountain Creek.

“What we’re putting into the creek, it has less bacteria in it than the creek does,” Dean Cohrs, the plant’s interim operations supervisor, recently told The Gazette.

The UV system, which is fully automated, is the largest of its type in Colorado and is considered one of the biggest west of the Mississippi, Dave Grossman, a spokesman for Colorado Springs Utilities, said Monday in an email.

“The UV light is applied at the end of the wastewater treatment process, just prior to being discharged in Fountain Creek. The intense light zaps bacteria from the wastewater,” he said.

According to Grossman, the UV system boasts several benefits, from preventing higher costs associated with the maintenance and repairs of outdated technology to enhancing the quality of the wastewater effluent, or discharge.

“Although we already meet environmental standards, tighter regulations are expected in the future. This technology will help meet those requirements,” he said.

“By using the new system,” Grossman added, “we eliminate the use of gaseous chlorine at the treatment plant. This reduces safety risks for employees and the community, as well as decreases security threats.”

To read a story about the UV system that was written by The Gazette in July, click here.

City-owned bus to transport city officials, Utilities employees to party

August 18th, 2011, 2:01 pm by

(not the actual bus)

Call it the SDS Express.

A city-owned bus is transporting former Mayor Lionel Rivera, City Council President Scott Hente, Colorado Springs Utilities CEO Jerry Forte and other city officials and Utilities employees Friday to the Pueblo Dam for a celebration commemorating the start of major construction on the 62-mile Southern Delivery System water pipeline.

“This is a more efficient way to transport the group than individual cars,” SDS spokeswoman Janet Rummel said in an email. “Those riding the bus will participate in a tour of construction at the dam prior to the event.”

Mayor Steve Bach is scheduled to attend Friday’s event, but he’s not going by bus, according the passenger list.

Rummel said such bus transportation “has been done for similar events that many Council members have attended in the past.”

Colorado Springs ratepayers will apparently foot the bill.

“I have been told that the bus gets 6 miles per gallon and the cost of the fuel per gallon is $2.56,” she wrote. “For the roundtrip, we estimate the cost of fuel to be just under $40. The City also has designated a City employee to drive the bus that morning instead of their normal dispatch duties.”

The bus is fueled from a city fuel station, Rummel said.

“Our understanding is that the driver was already scheduled to work that morning. We will work with the City to reimburse them for their costs,” she said.

Here’s the passenger list:

Council members riding the bus:
Scott Hente
Merv Bennett and his wife
Brandy Williams
Val Snider
Jan Martin
Tim Leigh (tentative)

Staff riding the bus:
Steve Cox
Jerry Forte
Gary Bostrom
John Fredell
Ken Burgess
Sherri Newell
Dave Padgett
Bill Cherrier
Bruce McCormick
Janet Rummel

In addition, former Mayor Lionel Rivera and Vice Mayor Larry Small will be riding the bus.

‘Kill the deer’ comment puts target on councilman’s back

July 7th, 2011, 10:30 am by

Colorado Springs City Councilman Tim Leigh may have put a big target on his back over what he says is the best way for cities to deal with an overpopulation of deer.

“The obvious answer is kill them,” Leigh said Tuesday.

On Wednesday, Ed Billings notified People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

“Colorado Springs City Councilman Tim Leigh is proposing to kill a supposed over population of deer in the Colorado Springs Area,” Billings wrote in an email to PETA.

Billings, who provided the animal rights organization Leigh’s contact information in an effort to put pressure on Leigh to reconsider the idea, also created a YouTube video mocking Leigh and featuring Councilwoman Lisa Czelatdko. To watch that video, click here.

CSAction.org also created a YouTube video encouraging viewers to contact Leigh as well as the other council members and Mayor Steve Bach. To watch that video, click here.

Here’s what CSAction.org wrote:

“One of our new developer-puppet city councilpersons, Tim Leigh (Hoff & Leigh) was interviewed this week by (Daniel) Chacon of the local daily and he reports he said the following:
“Erindale is apparently being overrun with deer”
“the obvious answer is KILL THEM.”
“KILL THE DEER”!

Well, we say that the people of our town need to tell this vicious, violent councilperson to keep his hands and guns OFF OUR DEER.
Write him:
TLeigh@springsgov.com
Phone: 719-385-5483
FAX: 719-385-5495

Write the rest of city council and tell them HANDS OFF OUR DEER!
adougan@springsgov.com
bherpin@springsgov.com
jmartin@springsgov.com
lczeladtko@springsgov.com
mccord_allen@yahoo.com
shente@springsgov.com
vsnider@springsgov.com
bwilliams@springsgov.com
mbennett@springsgov.com

And write the mayor and tell him HANDS OFF OUR DEER!
sbach@springsgov.com

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline