City Desk ~ An insider’s view of the policies and politics of Colorado Springs city government

Archive for the 'Police Protective Association' Tag

Springs police take aim at Memorial board

May 2nd, 2012, 2:02 pm by

Photo by Daniel J. Chacón

The Memorial Health System Board of Trustees is taking flak from all sides — even the cops.

The Colorado Springs Police Protective Association issued the following statement today:

The President of the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association (CSPPA), Dave Henrichsen, today commented on the recent Memorial Hospital CEO Payout:

On behalf of the CSPPA members and all city employees in general, I wish to thank Mayor Bach and all of the members of City Council for stepping up and holding the Memorial Hospital Board accountable.  The stance they have taken in the past few days has certainly not been easy, but it is very much appreciated.

At a time when we are fighting the rising costs of health care, especially for our retirees, exorbitant and unnecessary expenses such as the compensation package offered to former Memorial Hospital CEO Dr. McEvoy really makes us wonder what is going on- and where the priorities for our city lie?

This city is very fortunate to have a large number of incredibly dedicated employees who have spent their entire lives, some well over 30 to 40 years, enthusiastically devoted to serving our citizens and our community.  However, when they retire, they are surprised to find that they must get another job just to cover the extreme costs of their health care.  Many retirees are paying upwards of $1,700 per month for continued (basic) health care!

Imagine how much good ($1.15 million) could do if it were applied to the city. As this money came from our community, it is incredible that anyone would feel it appropriate to offer such a large sum to just one individual who spent a mere 4 years in service.

We appreciate their no nonsense approach to this problem, taking serious steps to correct it, and giving all city employees the sense that finally our elected leadership is stepping up, taking care of business, and trying to do what is right for all.

Quote of the Day

May 23rd, 2011, 10:46 am by

Robin Rogers

“We all want the same thing, which is a great community, so we’re going to be working with him as best we can, and I’m sure he feels the same way. You play the politics and you move on.”

Robin Rogers, executive director of the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association, which campaigned against Mayor-elect Steve Bach in the hard-fought mayoral runoff between Bach and Richard Skorman.

Rogers said the PPA is putting the campaign behind.

“We campaign for the candidate we feel is best. But in the end you have to work with what you’re given. It is what it is, and we are going to work with him for the best of the community. Like I said, we all have families here. We all live here. It’s important for all of us.”

Don’t give developers the keys to City Hall, Skorman says in new ad

May 6th, 2011, 2:32 pm by

In his third and final TV ad, mayoral candidate Richard Skorman says he’s the “clear choice” for mayor and that voters shouldn’t give developers the keys to City Hall, a message he’s hammered throughout the campaign trail.

Campaign spokeswoman Camille Blakely said the ad will start airing tonight through May 17, which is Election Day.

In the ad, Skorman totally looks the part, appearing in a suit and tie while sitting in a fancy office in what appears to be the Plaza of the Rockies.

“You have a clear choice for strong mayor,” Skorman says in the ad.

(To watch the ad, click here.)

“I can bring lasting change to this city because I’ve already done it before,” he says, referring to the Trails Open Space and Parks initiative, as the camera scans one of the city’s open spaces with snow-capped Pikes Peak in the background.

“I’ll make City Hall more efficient, but I won’t compromise public safety,” says Skorman, who has been endorsed by the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association and the Colorado Springs Professional Firefighters Association.

“I’ll help grow local businesses and recruit new ones to add needed jobs,” he says.

“We shouldn’t give developers the keys to City Hall because they’ve had too much influence for too long,” he says.

“Join me in making Colorado Springs better for all of us. Vote Skorman for a real change.”

Quote of the Day

May 6th, 2011, 6:26 am by

“This has been going on for years, with a wink and nod, as long as the political activity in question serves the interests of a council majority, or of certain past city managers, or of a city attorney who has a real genius for finding legal technicalities to justify questionable activities.”

– former Councilman Sean Paige, who wrote in his blog today that the city has turned a blind eye to on-the-clock politics in the past.

Paige’s blog post was triggered by a “politically charged email” sent by the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association to some city employees at work alleging that mayoral candidate Steve Bach would implement slash-and-burn policies if elected.

In his blog, Paige mentions that The Gazette had a story in April about Colorado Springs Utilities employees meeting to discuss elections “but lost interest when it learned that the Police Chief wasn’t in attendance.”

After learning about the meeting, The Gazette interviewed a manager and a spokesman at Utilities last month who said that while the meeting took place at a city-owned facility, it didn’t occur while employees were on the clock.

Police association says Bach would slash city employees’ pay, benefits

May 4th, 2011, 8:35 am by

The Colorado Springs Police Protective Association sent out an email calling mayoral candidate Steve Bach a “local developer” who would slash city employees’ pay and benefits to solve the city’s financial problems if he’s elected.

The email was sent to about a dozen city employees at work, prompting Steve Cox, acting city manager, to issue a warning to all employees to stay out of politics while they’re on the clock.

Here’s a copy of the letter sent via email by the PPA:

Dear City Employee,

Please consider the well-researched information in this letter about the upcoming runoff election for Mayor. There are long-term, serious consequences to YOU, whether you are a general City, Hospital or Utilities employee.

On November 16, 2009, an email by Stephen Bartolin (President and CEO of the Broadmoor Hotel) was sent to Mayor Lionel Rivera and City Council, complaining about budget cuts and water rate increases impacting his particular business. He felt these were unfair and unnecessary, and that Council should make cuts in what he called the “Ferrari” package of City employee pay and benefits. He suggested that City employees should receive pay and benefits more in line with those of his hotel’s employees.

In his letter, Mr. Bartolin provided the following “constructive comments” or suggestions about City budget problems:

1. Reduce all City staffing from 1805 to 1550 employees

2. Reduce payroll cost from 70% to 30%

3. Reduce the average per employee cost from $89,196 to $24,460 (including benefits)

4. Reduce the number of salaried employees making more than $100,000 from 67 to the

neighborhood of 13

5. Drive City vehicles at least 200,000 miles and then look at buying used vehicles

6. Move (minimum) retirement age to 60 – no matter how many years of service – both

for collection of pension benefits and for medical insurance

7. Restructure the health insurance program to one comparable to what is being offered

in the private sector and examine the costs shared by the employee

8. Move any retirees reaching age 65 to Medicare and off the City plan

Suggestions 7 and 8 were actually implemented in the 2011 budget. The effect was immediately apparent in your cost of health insurance.

Suggestion 8 was implemented in September of 2010 when the Council adopted

Ordinance 10-74. The long-term effect of this ordinance may increase the after retirement costs of the average Police and Fire retiree currently under the age of 55 by as much as $6,000 per year — excluding inflation of medical costs and any future Medicare reforms. The practical effect may well be that you will never be able to afford to retire.

Mayor Rivera and Council asked Mr. Bartolin to “create an independent advisory group” to consult with the City. The advisory group was formed but had no City managers or employees as members. Not surprisingly, this group agreed with Mr. Bartolin about the “Ferrari” pay and benefits plan. (See Bartolin letter and Mayor Rivera letter on file at the Office of the Mayor)

So what do Mr. Bartolin’s letter and the advisory group have to do with the current race for Mayor?

Steve Bach, a local developer, is a candidate for Mayor and has never held public office.

Most significantly to YOU, Mr. Bach totally espouses the Bartolin and advisory group recommendations drastically cuttings employee pay and benefits – they are the foundation of his “plan” to solve the City’s financial problems as he sees them. (See his web site under the Action Plan tab at http://www.stevebachmayor.com). Mr. Bach’s candidacy is supported by the Broadmoor Hotel and Steve Bartolin and many private sector interests who stand to profit from his “outsourcing” ideas. He has been publically endorsed by the Colorado director of Americans for Prosperity, a partisan political group started and funded by Kansas oil billionaires which is targeting public employees and their pay and benefits across the country (Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Tennesee and New Jersey, for example). Another partisan political group, Magellan Strategies, has made telephone “push-polls” to Colorado Springs voters, supporting Mr. Bach and distorting his opponent’s record, values and proposals. Just ask yourself – should there be a “partisan” way to provide police or fire services or medical care, to pave streets or plow snow, or provide electricity and clean water? Or to compensate public employees for their service?

Richard Skorman is also running for Mayor. You may know Richard or recognize his name. For over twenty years he has been a Colorado Springs resident, and a downtown business owner whose employees enjoy a living wage and health insurance. He has real experience in City government, having been a Councilman, a Vice Mayor, and Chairman of the Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments. He understands the complicated nature of governmental, economic and legal issues facing the City. He has proved his respect for City employees and his willingness to work with them. (See http://www.skorman4mayor.com)

There are many challenges facing the City in the next four years. These are difficult times and many people are struggling. Any solution must involve shared sacrifices. However, Mr. Bach and his supporters have targeted YOU as a City employee as the key problem, and drastic cuts in your pay and benefits as the key solution. Do you feel this is a “shared” sacrifice or a fair one? Do you think you have a “Ferrari” benefits plan? Do you think you can support yourself and your family on a proposed salary of $24,460 including benefits as Mr. Bach seems to believe?

The stakes of this election are high for all City employees. PLEASE – please take the time to vote for Richard Skorman for Mayor. Please consider contributing to his runoff campaign, and contact your friends and neighbors and ask them to support Richard for Mayor. And remember to vote by mailing or dropping off your ballot so it is received by May 17th.

Thank you!

Springs ‘bowing to unions and special interest groups,’ Collins says

April 19th, 2011, 9:39 pm by

Helen Collins, who was part of a slate of at-large City Council candidates recruited by anti-tax activist Douglas Bruce, says Colorado Springs may pay dearly because a 527 political organization with union ties was involved in the April 5 municipal election.

The political organization, registered under the name Save Colorado Springs Now, was funded primarily by the Housing and Building Association of Colorado Springs and the political arm of the Greater Colorado Springs Chamber of Commerce. Other donors included the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association.

The group campaigned against Bruce and two other members of the slate, Ed Bircham and Richard Bruce.

“Debbie Wamsley, the registered agent for the 527, used to be the head of the AFL-CIO in Denver,” Collins said in an email.

“The new City Council members will now feel they are obligated to their donors who want to do nothing but spend, spend, spend, just like the Federal government,” she wrote. “I hope the new City Council proves me wrong.”

Springs citizens “need to wake up and ask for transparency,” Collins said.

“Your article points to how much Colorado Springs citizens and city government are bowing to unions and special interest groups,” she said.

Douglas Bruce and ‘his cronies’ targeted by new political committee

March 22nd, 2011, 10:43 am by

A newly formed 527 political committee is going after Douglas Bruce and two other City Council candidates that Bruce recruited to run for office as a slate.

The Save Colorado Springs Now political committee, based in Arvada, is being led by Debbie Wamsley, who used to be the chief of staff at the Colorado AFL-CIO.

“At this point in time, I cannot say anything more, but thanks for the call,” Wamsley, the political committee’s registered agent, said in a brief telephone interview Monday before hanging up.

Read more about Wamsley by clicking here.

Save Colorado Springs Now has a website that features only a homepage.

“Save Colorado Springs Now is a group of concerned Colorado Springs citizens who believe that the City of Colorado Springs deserves policies and programs that serve to create economic opportunity, preserve the financial integrity of the city and improve the national and statewide reputation of the City,” the website state. “Save Colorado Springs Now was organized to advance a business oriented, prosperity-driven agenda in the City and educate the general public about the issues relevant to City governance.”

The group is behind a flyer that portrays Bruce and “his cronies” Ed Bircham and Richard Bruce as a curse on Colorado Springs. The three are part of a slate of candidates calling themselves the Reform Team. The two other members are Helen Collins and Gretchen Kasameyer.

“Don’t let Doug Bruce, Ed Bricham and R. Bruce drag us down again,” according to the flyer, which includes pictures of the three men in a sinking ship.

“With Bruce, Bircham & Bruce … we’re pretty much sunk.”

The flyer, which one of Bircham’s employees received at home last week, promotes three other council candidates: incumbent Jan Martin and Merv Bennett and Tim Leigh.

All three have received campaign contributions from two powerful employee groups: the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association and the Colorado Springs Professional Firefighters.

“Preserve our jobs, our economic growth and our city’s reputation with Jan Martin, Merv Bennett and Tim Leigh,” the flyer states.

“With Martin, Bennett & Leigh, Colorado Springs will steam ahead.”

Martin said she didn’t know anything about the group.

“Oh my goodness gracious,” Martin said after she saw the flyer.

“I guess it’s just open season for campaigning,” she said.

“I’m glad I’m on the right side of the ship, though,” she added, laughing.

For Douglas Bruce, the flier is no laughing matter.

“That’s a classic hit piece,” he said.

“It’s just another smear job,” he added. “What more do you want in terms of dirty politics?”

Is Skorman waffling on collective bargaining for city workers?

March 2nd, 2011, 11:18 am by

Richard Skorman and Jeremy Kroto, president of the Colorado Springs Professional Firefighters Association, during the opening of Skorman's campaign headquarters

Mayoral candidate Richard Skorman, who has been endorsed by the city’s police officers and firefighters, maintains that his position on collective bargaining has been consistent.

Do you agree?

On Feb. 11, a day after his campaign issued a press release about the endorsement from the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association and the Colorado Springs Professional Firefighters Association, Skorman said he didn’t support collective bargaining.

But he gave himself a little wiggle room.

“As I told the police and firefighters when they asked, I do not support collective bargaining in the current economic climate,” Skorman said in an e-mail.

When asked for clarification Feb. 14, Skorman said in a one-on-one interview that he didn’t support collective bargaining.

“I don’t support collective bargaining,” he said. “If it came forward and it always does in good economies, if it did come forward, the only way I would support it is if there was nonbinding arbitration.”

During a candidate forum Feb. 24, when mayoral and City Council candidates were asked whether they supported collective bargaining with a “yes” or “no” answer, Skorman said “maybe.”

Today, Skorman tried to set the record straight.

“My position has been consistent,” he said in a telephone message.

“As I told the police and firefighters, Colorado Springs should not move toward collective bargaining at this time. In a better economic climate with the city’s long-term obligations under control, I might be open to some form of negotiation with public employees, joint negotiations,” he said.

“My ‘maybe’ response at the OWN forum referred to the possibility that this issue could be reviewed in the future, and I’ve been consistent all along on this, but not for the next several years. I don’t think collective bargaining with municipal workers makes sense, and I wouldn’t support it,” he said. “I hope that clears it for you.”

By the way … the police association contributed $10,000 and the firefighters association contributed $2,500 to Skorman’s campaign last month.

Collective bargaining for cops and firefighters heats up in mayor’s race

February 11th, 2011, 12:25 pm by

Following yesterday’s news that the Colorado Springs Police Protective Association and Colorado Springs Professional Firefighters Association had endorsed Richard Skorman for mayor, fellow mayoral candidate Buddy Gilmore said he sort of expected it.

“I couldn’t go the collective bargaining route,” Gilmore wrote on Facebook.

Does that mean Skorman supports collective bargaining for the city’s cops and firefighters?

“As I told the police and firefighters when they asked, I do not support collective bargaining in the current economic climate,” Skorman said in an e-mail last night.

That sounds like Skorman is leaving the option open.

Pete Tomitsch, president of the CSPPA, said his group is “proud” to endorse Skorman.

“We believe that Mr. Skorman has a proven and tested track record of looking out for the best interests of the citizens of this city,” Tomitsch said in a statement released by the Skorman campaign.

“His vision for Colorado Springs is broad and inclusive and reaches out to all demographic groups. Our organization believes that Richard Skorman is the best candidate to lead our city into a challenging future,” he said.

Jeremy Kroto, president of the firefighters association, said Skorman is a proven leader.

“Richard has an established track record of advocating for the resources Colorado Springs Professional Firefighters need to safely and efficiently protect the citizens of Colorado Springs,” Kroto said in the same statement.

Skorman, a former councilman, is being supported by other city employees.

According to campaign finance reports:

Ann Crossey, the city’s human resources director, contributed $300 on Jan. 26.

The city’s sustainability coordinator, Carrie McCausland, contributed $75 on Jan. 28.

Juliet Draper, a gay firefighter who became the poster child in the fight for health care benefits for same-sex partners of city employees, contributed $100 on Jan. 26.